Uses and limitations of faecal egg count for assessing worm burden in wild boars

Diana Gassó; Cales Feliu; David Ferrer; Gregorio Mentaberre; Encarna Casas-Díaz; Roser Velarde; Xavier Fernández-Aguilar; Andreu Colom-Cadena; Nora Navarro-Gonzalez; Jorge Ramón López-Olvera; Santiago Lavín; Pedro Fenández-Llario; Joaquim Segalés; Emmanuel Serrano

doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.02.006

Uses and limitations of faecal egg count for assessing worm burden in wild boars

Diana Gassó, Cales Feliu, David Ferrer, Gregorio Mentaberre, Encarna Casas-Díaz, Roser Velarde, Xavier Fernández-Aguilar, Andreu Colom-Cadena, Nora Navarro-Gonzalez, Jorge Ramón López-Olvera, Santiago Lavín, Pedro Fenández-Llario, Joaquim Segalés, Emmanuel Serrano

Producción científica: Contribución a una revista › Artículo › Investigación › revisión exhaustiva

30 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

© 2015 Elsevier B.V. The most widely used technique to assess helminth infection in both domestic and wild mammals is the faecal egg count (FEC). Most efforts to test the reliability of FEC as a proxy for parasite load are in small ruminant studies and limited work has evaluated the use of FEC in pigs. The aim of this study was to explore whether FEC is a reliable indicator of helminth load, and to evaluate the effects of sample storage on FEC accuracy in 59 wild boars. Though FEC was useful for assessing most helminth infections (e.g., Metastrongylus spp., Ascaris suum, Trichuris suis), stomach nematodes were often missed. The accuracy of FEC decreased over time, and thus it is recommended that samples be processed within 5 days of collection.

Idioma original	Inglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)	133-137
Publicación	Veterinary Parasitology
Volumen	209
N.º	1-2
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.02.006
Estado	Publicada - 1 ene 2015

Acceder al documento

10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.02.006

Citar esto

Gassó, D., Feliu, C., Ferrer, D., Mentaberre, G., Casas-Díaz, E., Velarde, R., Fernández-Aguilar, X., Colom-Cadena, A., Navarro-Gonzalez, N., López-Olvera, J. R., Lavín, S., Fenández-Llario, P., Segalés, J., & Serrano, E. (2015). Uses and limitations of faecal egg count for assessing worm burden in wild boars. Veterinary Parasitology, 209(1-2), 133-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.02.006

@article{9e62607b942e4c28bb69235784ed0838,

title = "Uses and limitations of faecal egg count for assessing worm burden in wild boars",

abstract = "{\textcopyright} 2015 Elsevier B.V. The most widely used technique to assess helminth infection in both domestic and wild mammals is the faecal egg count (FEC). Most efforts to test the reliability of FEC as a proxy for parasite load are in small ruminant studies and limited work has evaluated the use of FEC in pigs. The aim of this study was to explore whether FEC is a reliable indicator of helminth load, and to evaluate the effects of sample storage on FEC accuracy in 59 wild boars. Though FEC was useful for assessing most helminth infections (e.g., Metastrongylus spp., Ascaris suum, Trichuris suis), stomach nematodes were often missed. The accuracy of FEC decreased over time, and thus it is recommended that samples be processed within 5 days of collection.",

keywords = "Coprological analysis, McMaster egg counting, Sus scrofa",

author = "Diana Gass{\'o} and Cales Feliu and David Ferrer and Gregorio Mentaberre and Encarna Casas-D{\'i}az and Roser Velarde and Xavier Fern{\'a}ndez-Aguilar and Andreu Colom-Cadena and Nora Navarro-Gonzalez and L{\'o}pez-Olvera, {Jorge Ram{\'o}n} and Santiago Lav{\'i}n and Pedro Fen{\'a}ndez-Llario and Joaquim Segal{\'e}s and Emmanuel Serrano",

year = "2015",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.02.006",

language = "English",

volume = "209",

pages = "133--137",

journal = "Veterinary Parasitology",

issn = "0304-4017",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "1-2",

}

Gassó, D, Feliu, C, Ferrer, D, Mentaberre, G, Casas-Díaz, E, Velarde, R, Fernández-Aguilar, X, Colom-Cadena, A, Navarro-Gonzalez, N, López-Olvera, JR , Lavín, S, Fenández-Llario, P, Segalés, J & Serrano, E 2015, 'Uses and limitations of faecal egg count for assessing worm burden in wild boars', Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 209, n.º 1-2, pp. 133-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.02.006

TY - JOUR

T1 - Uses and limitations of faecal egg count for assessing worm burden in wild boars

AU - Gassó, Diana

AU - Feliu, Cales

AU - Ferrer, David

AU - Mentaberre, Gregorio

AU - Casas-Díaz, Encarna

AU - Velarde, Roser

AU - Fernández-Aguilar, Xavier

AU - Colom-Cadena, Andreu

AU - Navarro-Gonzalez, Nora

AU - López-Olvera, Jorge Ramón

AU - Lavín, Santiago

AU - Fenández-Llario, Pedro

AU - Segalés, Joaquim

AU - Serrano, Emmanuel

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - © 2015 Elsevier B.V. The most widely used technique to assess helminth infection in both domestic and wild mammals is the faecal egg count (FEC). Most efforts to test the reliability of FEC as a proxy for parasite load are in small ruminant studies and limited work has evaluated the use of FEC in pigs. The aim of this study was to explore whether FEC is a reliable indicator of helminth load, and to evaluate the effects of sample storage on FEC accuracy in 59 wild boars. Though FEC was useful for assessing most helminth infections (e.g., Metastrongylus spp., Ascaris suum, Trichuris suis), stomach nematodes were often missed. The accuracy of FEC decreased over time, and thus it is recommended that samples be processed within 5 days of collection.

AB - © 2015 Elsevier B.V. The most widely used technique to assess helminth infection in both domestic and wild mammals is the faecal egg count (FEC). Most efforts to test the reliability of FEC as a proxy for parasite load are in small ruminant studies and limited work has evaluated the use of FEC in pigs. The aim of this study was to explore whether FEC is a reliable indicator of helminth load, and to evaluate the effects of sample storage on FEC accuracy in 59 wild boars. Though FEC was useful for assessing most helminth infections (e.g., Metastrongylus spp., Ascaris suum, Trichuris suis), stomach nematodes were often missed. The accuracy of FEC decreased over time, and thus it is recommended that samples be processed within 5 days of collection.

KW - Coprological analysis

KW - McMaster egg counting

KW - Sus scrofa

U2 - 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.02.006

DO - 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.02.006

M3 - Article

SN - 0304-4017

VL - 209

SP - 133

EP - 137

JO - Veterinary Parasitology

JF - Veterinary Parasitology

IS - 1-2

ER -

Uses and limitations of faecal egg count for assessing worm burden in wild boars

Resumen

Acceder al documento

Huella

Citar esto