Resumen
Under test-based accountability, side-effects —including practices to inflate test results, often seen as cheating—are usually associated to so-called high-stakes policies. However, the influence of different types of stakes in the generation of this type of practices has been overlooked in education research. Based on a survey experiment, our results indicate that the type and level of stakes of accountability systems (e.g., high- vs. low-stakes, material vs. symbolic) do not differ in triggering side-effects. Counterintuitively, individual symbolic consequences trigger similar reactions among teachers than material incentives. In-depth interviews give insights into the social mechanisms that lead to symbolic effects having such an influence in understanding teachers’ reactivity to accountability.
| Idioma original | Inglés |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 31-60 |
| Número de páginas | 30 |
| Publicación | Educational Policy |
| Volumen | 38 |
| N.º | 1 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Publicada - 4 ene 2023 |
Palabras clave
- test-based accountability
- standardized tests
- accountability policy options
- undesired responses
- teacher reputation
- side-effects
- cheating
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Understanding the Stakes: The Influence of Accountability Policy Options on Teachers’ Responses'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver