TY - JOUR
T1 - Toward sustainable and just forest recovery
T2 - research gaps and potentials for knowledge integration
AU - Scheidel, Arnim
AU - Gingrich, Simone
N1 - Funding Information:
S.G. acknowledges funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (ERC StG “HEFT,” GA 757995 ). A.S. acknowledges funding from the Beatriu de Pinós postdoctoral program of the Government of Catalonia's Secretariat for Universities and Research of the Ministry of Economy and Knowledge ( 2017 BP 00023 ), and support by the ERC project “EnvJustice” (GA 695446 ). The authors wish to thank two highly constructive reviewers for their thorough reading and detailed comments, as well as the editor, for their great assistance in developing and finalizing the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Inc.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/12/18
Y1 - 2020/12/18
N2 - Forest recovery is central for addressing major sustainability challenges, such as climate change and biodiversity loss. While positive assessments prevail over the global ecological forest restoration potential, critical research highlights limited potentials and even detrimental local impacts, particularly in the Global South. Here, we argue that knowledge integration across land system science (LSS) and political ecology (PE) can contribute to addressing this contradiction and advance knowledge about ecologically sustainable and socially just forest recovery. We identify five key areas where knowledge integration is promising: (1) developing multidimensional forest definitions, (2) linking forest land to users and interests, (3) identifying reforestation failures and successes, (4) associating drivers and impacts across places and scales, and (5) including justice dimensions in assessments of socio-ecological forest recovery potentials. For each knowledge area, we review key contributions by LSS and PE, and outline future research directions to address ecologically sustainable and socially just forest recovery. High hopes are placed on forest recovery for mitigating climate change and benefiting local communities, but severe ecological and social concerns prevail over its impacts on the ground. We propose that further linking two interdisciplinary research fields, land system science and political ecology, helps to address these concerns. For five knowledge areas we discuss problems related to lack of knowledge integration, identify specific contributions by the two fields, and outline future research directions to advance ecologically sustainable and socially just forest recovery.
AB - Forest recovery is central for addressing major sustainability challenges, such as climate change and biodiversity loss. While positive assessments prevail over the global ecological forest restoration potential, critical research highlights limited potentials and even detrimental local impacts, particularly in the Global South. Here, we argue that knowledge integration across land system science (LSS) and political ecology (PE) can contribute to addressing this contradiction and advance knowledge about ecologically sustainable and socially just forest recovery. We identify five key areas where knowledge integration is promising: (1) developing multidimensional forest definitions, (2) linking forest land to users and interests, (3) identifying reforestation failures and successes, (4) associating drivers and impacts across places and scales, and (5) including justice dimensions in assessments of socio-ecological forest recovery potentials. For each knowledge area, we review key contributions by LSS and PE, and outline future research directions to address ecologically sustainable and socially just forest recovery. High hopes are placed on forest recovery for mitigating climate change and benefiting local communities, but severe ecological and social concerns prevail over its impacts on the ground. We propose that further linking two interdisciplinary research fields, land system science and political ecology, helps to address these concerns. For five knowledge areas we discuss problems related to lack of knowledge integration, identify specific contributions by the two fields, and outline future research directions to advance ecologically sustainable and socially just forest recovery.
KW - afforestation
KW - climate change mitigation
KW - conflict
KW - conservation
KW - forest transitions
KW - justice
KW - land system science
KW - political ecology
KW - reforestation
KW - transdisciplinarity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098210737&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.11.005
DO - 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.11.005
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85098210737
SN - 2590-3330
VL - 3
SP - 680
EP - 690
JO - One Earth
JF - One Earth
IS - 6
ER -