The acquisition of Chinese relative clauses: Contrasting two theoretical approaches

Shenai Hu, Anna Gavarró, Mirta Vernice, Maria Teresa Guasti

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículo de revisiónInvestigaciónrevisión exhaustiva

31 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

© Cambridge University Press 2015. This study examines the comprehension of relative clauses by Chinese-speaking children, and evaluates the validity of the predictions of the Dependency Locality Theory (Gibson, 1998, 2000) and the Relativized Minimality approach (Friedmann, Belletti & Rizzi, 2009). One hundred and twenty children from three to eight years of age were tested by using a character-sentence matching task. We found a preference for subject relative clauses that persists as children grow older. This preference is predicted by the Relativized Minimality approach, but not by the Dependency Locality Theory. In addition, we observed a fine-grained class of errors in comprehension. We discuss it in the light of the head-final status of Chinese relative clauses.
Idioma originalInglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)1-21
PublicaciónJournal of Child Language
Volumen43
N.º1
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 1 ene 2016

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'The acquisition of Chinese relative clauses: Contrasting two theoretical approaches'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto