TY - JOUR
T1 - Smart-Plant Decision Support System (SP-DSS)
T2 - Defining a multi-criteria decision-making framework for the selection of WWTP configurations with resource recovery
AU - Južnič-Zonta, Živko
AU - Guisasola, Albert
AU - Baeza, Juan Antonio
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
PY - 2022/9/20
Y1 - 2022/9/20
N2 - The development of the Smart-Plant Decision Support System (SP-DSS) is presented, which helps to find the optimal water resource recovery facility (WRRF) configuration for a specific case. A general plant superstructure is defined to allow the evaluation of different combinations among the available process unit options, considering technical, economic, and environmental impact criteria. The complete evaluation is based on a five-step framework: (i) design problem set-up, (ii) wastewater inflow generation, (iii) superstructure generation and plant-wide model simulation under dynamic conditions, (iv) estimation of multi-criteria objective values (greenhouse gas emissions, accumulation of effluent violations, effluent quality index, net present value, system readiness level and plant land area), and (v) design configuration multi-criteria sorting with the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). SP-DSS application is shown comparing the mainstream shortcut enhanced phosphorus and polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) recovery (SCEPPHAR) technology with a conventional anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic (A2O) configuration for a medium size WWTP (Manresa, Spain). The comparison shows both configurations allow meeting discharge limits, and among other criteria, the SCEPPHAR novel configuration, with respect to A2O, shows higher pollutant contents in the effluent (3.30 vs 2.34 gPoll/m3), higher capital expenditures (CAPEX 0.191 vs 0.130 €/m3), lower operational expenditures (OPEX 0.397 vs 0.515 €/m3), lower required tariff (0.654 vs 0.674 €/m3) and higher greenhouse gas emissions (GHG 0.19 vs 0.14 kgCO2/m3). Overall, TOPSIS sorting indicates A2O is still the best configuration for this specific case.
AB - The development of the Smart-Plant Decision Support System (SP-DSS) is presented, which helps to find the optimal water resource recovery facility (WRRF) configuration for a specific case. A general plant superstructure is defined to allow the evaluation of different combinations among the available process unit options, considering technical, economic, and environmental impact criteria. The complete evaluation is based on a five-step framework: (i) design problem set-up, (ii) wastewater inflow generation, (iii) superstructure generation and plant-wide model simulation under dynamic conditions, (iv) estimation of multi-criteria objective values (greenhouse gas emissions, accumulation of effluent violations, effluent quality index, net present value, system readiness level and plant land area), and (v) design configuration multi-criteria sorting with the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). SP-DSS application is shown comparing the mainstream shortcut enhanced phosphorus and polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) recovery (SCEPPHAR) technology with a conventional anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic (A2O) configuration for a medium size WWTP (Manresa, Spain). The comparison shows both configurations allow meeting discharge limits, and among other criteria, the SCEPPHAR novel configuration, with respect to A2O, shows higher pollutant contents in the effluent (3.30 vs 2.34 gPoll/m3), higher capital expenditures (CAPEX 0.191 vs 0.130 €/m3), lower operational expenditures (OPEX 0.397 vs 0.515 €/m3), lower required tariff (0.654 vs 0.674 €/m3) and higher greenhouse gas emissions (GHG 0.19 vs 0.14 kgCO2/m3). Overall, TOPSIS sorting indicates A2O is still the best configuration for this specific case.
KW - DSS
KW - EBPR
KW - Resource recovery
KW - Superstructure
KW - Water resource recovery facility (WRRF)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133811521&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132873
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132873
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85133811521
SN - 0959-6526
VL - 367
JO - Journal of Cleaner Production
JF - Journal of Cleaner Production
M1 - 132873
ER -