TY - JOUR
T1 - Renal function improvement in liver transplant recipients after early everolimus conversion: A clinical practice cohort study in Spain
AU - Bilbao, Itxarone
AU - Salcedo, Magdalena
AU - Gõmez, Miguel Angel
AU - Jimenez, Carlos
AU - Castroagudín, Javier
AU - Fabregat, Joan
AU - Almohalla, Carolina
AU - Herrero, Ignacio
AU - Cuervas-Mons, Valentín
AU - Otero, Alejandra
AU - Rubín, Angel
AU - Miras, Manuel
AU - Rodrigo, Juan
AU - Serrano, Trinidad
AU - Crespo, Gonzalo
AU - Mata, Manuel De La
AU - Bustamante, Javier
AU - Gonzalez-Dieguez, M. Luisa
AU - Moreno, Antonia
AU - Narvaez, Isidoro
AU - Guilera, Magda
PY - 2015/1/1
Y1 - 2015/1/1
N2 - © 2015 AASLD. © 2015 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. A national, multicenter, retrospective study was conducted to assess the results obtained for liver transplant recipients with conversion to everolimus in daily practice. The study included 477 recipients (481 transplantations). Indications for conversion to everolimus were renal dysfunction (32.6% of cases), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; 30.2%; prophylactic treatment for 68.9%), and de novo malignancy (29.7%). The median time from transplantation to conversion to everolimus was 68.7 months for de novo malignancy, 23.8 months for renal dysfunction, and 7.1 months for HCC and other indications. During the first year of treatment, mean everolimus trough levels were 5.4 (standard deviation [SD], 2.7) ng/mL and doses remained stable (1.5 mg/day) from the first month after conversion. An everolimus monotherapy regimen was followed by 28.5% of patients at 12 months. Patients with renal dysfunction showed a glomerular filtration rate (4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) increase of 10.9 mL (baseline mean, 45.8 [SD, 25.3] versus 57.6 [SD, 27.6] mL/minute/1.73 m2) at 3 months after everolimus initiation (P < 0.001), and 6.8 mL at 12 months. Improvement in renal function was higher in patients with early conversion (<1 year). Adverse events were the primary reason for discontinuation in 11.2% of cases. The probability of survival at 3 years after conversion to everolimus was 83.0%, 71.1%, and 59.5% for the renal dysfunction, de novo malignancy, and HCC groups, respectively. Everolimus is a viable option for the treatment of renal dysfunction, and earlier conversion is associated with better recovery of renal function. Prospective studies are needed to confirm advantages in patients with malignancy. Liver Transpl 21:1056-1065, 2015.
AB - © 2015 AASLD. © 2015 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. A national, multicenter, retrospective study was conducted to assess the results obtained for liver transplant recipients with conversion to everolimus in daily practice. The study included 477 recipients (481 transplantations). Indications for conversion to everolimus were renal dysfunction (32.6% of cases), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; 30.2%; prophylactic treatment for 68.9%), and de novo malignancy (29.7%). The median time from transplantation to conversion to everolimus was 68.7 months for de novo malignancy, 23.8 months for renal dysfunction, and 7.1 months for HCC and other indications. During the first year of treatment, mean everolimus trough levels were 5.4 (standard deviation [SD], 2.7) ng/mL and doses remained stable (1.5 mg/day) from the first month after conversion. An everolimus monotherapy regimen was followed by 28.5% of patients at 12 months. Patients with renal dysfunction showed a glomerular filtration rate (4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) increase of 10.9 mL (baseline mean, 45.8 [SD, 25.3] versus 57.6 [SD, 27.6] mL/minute/1.73 m2) at 3 months after everolimus initiation (P < 0.001), and 6.8 mL at 12 months. Improvement in renal function was higher in patients with early conversion (<1 year). Adverse events were the primary reason for discontinuation in 11.2% of cases. The probability of survival at 3 years after conversion to everolimus was 83.0%, 71.1%, and 59.5% for the renal dysfunction, de novo malignancy, and HCC groups, respectively. Everolimus is a viable option for the treatment of renal dysfunction, and earlier conversion is associated with better recovery of renal function. Prospective studies are needed to confirm advantages in patients with malignancy. Liver Transpl 21:1056-1065, 2015.
U2 - 10.1002/lt.24172
DO - 10.1002/lt.24172
M3 - Article
SN - 1527-6465
VL - 21
SP - 1056
EP - 1065
JO - Liver Transplantation
JF - Liver Transplantation
IS - 8
ER -