TY - JOUR
T1 - Intercomparison of personal and ambient neutron detectors used for radiation protection in a synchrotron-based proton therapy facility
T2 - experimental and Monte Carlo results
AU - Martínez-Francés, Evangelina
AU - Morán, Verónica
AU - Romero, Ana M.
AU - Cabello-García, J. Pablo
AU - Viñals, Alberto
AU - Burguete, Javier
AU - Rivera, Sergio
AU - Rodríguez, Rafael
AU - Méndez, Roberto
AU - Domingo, Carles
AU - Martí-Climent, Josep M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica e Sanitaria
PY - 2025/8
Y1 - 2025/8
N2 - Purpose: This study evaluates ambient and personal neutron detectors in a synchrotron-based proton therapy facility, using experimental data and Monte Carlo (TOPAS) simulations. It aims to assess the interchangeability of detectors, characterize neutron doses in the treatment room, and provide radiological protection recommendations. Method: A 10 × 10 × 10 cm3 volume (energy range: 121–173 MeV) was irradiated on a 30 × 30 × 60 cm3 solid water phantom. Ambient dose equivalent (H*(10)) was measured using two extended-energy-range detectors (LUPIN-II, WENDI-II) at 20 positions. Personal dose equivalent (Hp(10)) was evaluated using five dosimeters (bubble detectors, DOPEN tracks, NeutrakT, MCP6/MCP7 TLDs, NRF51 EPD) at 14–20 positions. Bland-Altman analysis quantified agreement. TOPAS, a Monte Carlo code, was employed to calculate neutron spectra and to compare the results with experimental H*(10) values for its validation. Results: The WENDI-II and LUPIN-II detectors showed good agreement, with WENDI-II readings 14 % higher on average. Among personal dosimeters, DOPEN tracks exhibited the closest agreement with bubble detectors, with a bias of −33 %. In constrast, NeutrakT underperformed due to its high detection limit. TOPAS simulations aligned with experimental H*(10) trends, with differences ranging from 0 to 32 %, except for positions involving significant PMMA attenuation. Neutron spectra revealed angular and distance-dependent variations, with thermal neutrons dominating at larger distances. Conclusions: Both WENDI-II and LUPIN-II are suitable for environmental neutron monitoring in synchrotron-based facilities. DOPEN tracks emerged as the most reliable passive personal dosimeter for Hp(10). Monte Carlo simulations enhanced understanding of neutron field behavior and were validated, in terms of H*(10), by the experimental results. Recommendations for radiological protection include replicating accidental exposures with WENDI-II and LUPIN-II to estimate doses accurately.
AB - Purpose: This study evaluates ambient and personal neutron detectors in a synchrotron-based proton therapy facility, using experimental data and Monte Carlo (TOPAS) simulations. It aims to assess the interchangeability of detectors, characterize neutron doses in the treatment room, and provide radiological protection recommendations. Method: A 10 × 10 × 10 cm3 volume (energy range: 121–173 MeV) was irradiated on a 30 × 30 × 60 cm3 solid water phantom. Ambient dose equivalent (H*(10)) was measured using two extended-energy-range detectors (LUPIN-II, WENDI-II) at 20 positions. Personal dose equivalent (Hp(10)) was evaluated using five dosimeters (bubble detectors, DOPEN tracks, NeutrakT, MCP6/MCP7 TLDs, NRF51 EPD) at 14–20 positions. Bland-Altman analysis quantified agreement. TOPAS, a Monte Carlo code, was employed to calculate neutron spectra and to compare the results with experimental H*(10) values for its validation. Results: The WENDI-II and LUPIN-II detectors showed good agreement, with WENDI-II readings 14 % higher on average. Among personal dosimeters, DOPEN tracks exhibited the closest agreement with bubble detectors, with a bias of −33 %. In constrast, NeutrakT underperformed due to its high detection limit. TOPAS simulations aligned with experimental H*(10) trends, with differences ranging from 0 to 32 %, except for positions involving significant PMMA attenuation. Neutron spectra revealed angular and distance-dependent variations, with thermal neutrons dominating at larger distances. Conclusions: Both WENDI-II and LUPIN-II are suitable for environmental neutron monitoring in synchrotron-based facilities. DOPEN tracks emerged as the most reliable passive personal dosimeter for Hp(10). Monte Carlo simulations enhanced understanding of neutron field behavior and were validated, in terms of H*(10), by the experimental results. Recommendations for radiological protection include replicating accidental exposures with WENDI-II and LUPIN-II to estimate doses accurately.
KW - Ambient dose equivalent
KW - Monte Carlo
KW - Neutron detector
KW - Personal dose equivalent
KW - Proton therapy
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105010890597
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/4cc1eea0-28b4-3137-9ad3-0fdf4c9170ee/
UR - https://portalrecerca.uab.cat/en/publications/6fa5528c-5345-4f6a-8efb-b3958e8123bc
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105044
DO - 10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105044
M3 - Article
C2 - 40684540
AN - SCOPUS:105010890597
SN - 1120-1797
VL - 136
JO - Physica Medica
JF - Physica Medica
M1 - 105044
ER -