TY - JOUR
T1 - Free Triples, Large Indifference Classes and the Majority Rule
AU - Barberà, Salvador
AU - Ehlers, Lars
N1 - Acknowledgments Weacknowledgeusefulcommentsandsuggestionsbyareferee,GabrielleDemange, MattJackson,andMauriceSalles.BarberàgratefullyacknowledgessupportfromtheSpanishMinistryof ScienceandInnovationthroughgrant“ConsolidatedGroup-C”ECO2008-04756,fromtheGeneralitatde Catalunya,Departamentd’Universitats,RecercaiSocietatdelaInformacióthroughtheDistincióperala PromociódelaRecercaUniversitàriaandgrantSGR2009-0419andfromtheBarcelonaGSEResearch Network.PartofthisarticlewaswrittenwhilethesecondauthorwasaMarieCurieResearchFellow atC.O.D.E.attheUniversitatAutònomadeBarcelona.HeacknowledgesthehospitalityoftheDepartamentd’Economiaid’HistòriaEconòmicaandfinancialsupportfromtheEuropeanUnionunderGrant No.HPMT-CT-2000-0017andtheFQRSC(Québec).
PY - 2011/8/17
Y1 - 2011/8/17
N2 - We study classes of voting situations where agents may exhibit a systematic inability to distinguish between the elements of certain sets of alternatives. These sets of alternatives may differ from voter to voter, thus resulting in personalized families of preferences. We study the properties of the majority relation when defined on restricted domains that are the cartesian product of preference families, each one reflecting the corresponding agent's objective indifferences, and otherwise allowing for all possible (strict) preference relations among alternatives. We present necessary and sufficient conditions on the preference domains of this type, guaranteeing that majority rule is quasi-transitive and thus the existence of Condorcet winners at any profile in the domain, and for any finite subset of alternatives. Finally, we compare our proposed restrictions with others in the literature, to conclude that they are independent of any previously discussed domain restriction. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.
AB - We study classes of voting situations where agents may exhibit a systematic inability to distinguish between the elements of certain sets of alternatives. These sets of alternatives may differ from voter to voter, thus resulting in personalized families of preferences. We study the properties of the majority relation when defined on restricted domains that are the cartesian product of preference families, each one reflecting the corresponding agent's objective indifferences, and otherwise allowing for all possible (strict) preference relations among alternatives. We present necessary and sufficient conditions on the preference domains of this type, guaranteeing that majority rule is quasi-transitive and thus the existence of Condorcet winners at any profile in the domain, and for any finite subset of alternatives. Finally, we compare our proposed restrictions with others in the literature, to conclude that they are independent of any previously discussed domain restriction. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/80053103548
U2 - 10.1007/s00355-011-0584-8
DO - 10.1007/s00355-011-0584-8
M3 - Article
SN - 0176-1714
VL - 37
SP - 559
EP - 574
JO - Social Choice and Welfare
JF - Social Choice and Welfare
IS - 4
ER -