Ecologies of contention: how more-than-human natures shape contentious actions and politics

Arnim Scheidel, Juan Liu*, Daniela Del Bene, Sara Mingorria, Sergio Villamayor-Tomas

*Autor correspondiente de este trabajo

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículoInvestigaciónrevisión exhaustiva

4 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Which role plays the more-than-human world in shaping the possibilities for contentious actions and politics? We discuss this question by revisiting reflections from social movement theory, agrarian studies, and commons management, and by reviewing empirical cases of protest significantly shaped by ecological endowments. Distinct political ecological opportunities may arise from vulnerabilities in ecological cycles, ecological potentials, interspecies relationships, ecological invisibility, ecological visibility, ecological resources, and ecological connectivity, among other features. However, whether people, activists, and social movements are able to turn them into a dynamic source of power ultimately depends upon how they perceive and relate themselves to the more-than-human world. © 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Idioma originalInglés
PublicaciónJournal of Peasant Studies
DOI
EstadoAceptada en prensa - 2022

Palabras clave

  • agrarian transformations
  • contentious actions
  • ecological endowments
  • environmental movements
  • Political ecological opportunities
  • social movements

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Ecologies of contention: how more-than-human natures shape contentious actions and politics'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto