TY - JOUR
T1 - Cross-contamination of mature Listeria monocytogenes biofilms from stainless steel surfaces to chicken broth before and after the application of chlorinated alkaline and enzymatic detergents
AU - Mazaheri, T.
AU - Ripolles-Avila, C.
AU - Rodríguez-Jerez, J. J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - The objectives of this study were, firstly, to compare a conventional (i.e., chlorinated alkaline) versus an alternative (chlorinated alkaline plus enzymatic) treatment effectivity for the elimination of biofilms from different L. monocytogenes strains (CECT 5672, CECT 935, S2-bac and EDG-e). Secondly, to evaluate the cross-contamination to chicken broth from non-treated and treated biofilms formed on stainless steel surfaces. Results showed that all L. monocytogenes strains were able to adhere and develop biofilms at approximately the same growth levels (≈5.82 log CFU/cm2). When non-treated biofilms were put into contact with the model food, obtained an average transference rate of potential global cross-contamination of 20.4%. Biofilms treated with the chlorinated alkaline detergent obtained transference rates similar to non-treated biofilms as a high number of residual cells (i.e., around 4 to 5 Log CFU/cm2) were present on the surface, except for EDG-e strain on which transference rate diminished to 0.45%, which was related to the protective matrix. Contrarily, the alternative treatment was shown to not produce cross-contamination to the chicken broth due to its high effectivity for biofilm control (<0.50% of transference) except for CECT 935 strain that had a different behavior. Therefore, changing to more intense cleaning treatments in the processing environments can reduce risk of cross-contamination.
AB - The objectives of this study were, firstly, to compare a conventional (i.e., chlorinated alkaline) versus an alternative (chlorinated alkaline plus enzymatic) treatment effectivity for the elimination of biofilms from different L. monocytogenes strains (CECT 5672, CECT 935, S2-bac and EDG-e). Secondly, to evaluate the cross-contamination to chicken broth from non-treated and treated biofilms formed on stainless steel surfaces. Results showed that all L. monocytogenes strains were able to adhere and develop biofilms at approximately the same growth levels (≈5.82 log CFU/cm2). When non-treated biofilms were put into contact with the model food, obtained an average transference rate of potential global cross-contamination of 20.4%. Biofilms treated with the chlorinated alkaline detergent obtained transference rates similar to non-treated biofilms as a high number of residual cells (i.e., around 4 to 5 Log CFU/cm2) were present on the surface, except for EDG-e strain on which transference rate diminished to 0.45%, which was related to the protective matrix. Contrarily, the alternative treatment was shown to not produce cross-contamination to the chicken broth due to its high effectivity for biofilm control (<0.50% of transference) except for CECT 935 strain that had a different behavior. Therefore, changing to more intense cleaning treatments in the processing environments can reduce risk of cross-contamination.
KW - Biofilms
KW - Cross-contamination
KW - Decontamination agents
KW - Food safety
KW - L. monocytogenes
KW - Stainless Steel/analysis
KW - Animals
KW - Chickens
KW - Listeria monocytogenes
KW - Colony Count, Microbial
KW - Detergents
KW - Food Microbiology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148702472&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.fm.2023.104236
DO - 10.1016/j.fm.2023.104236
M3 - Article
C2 - 36906320
AN - SCOPUS:85148702472
SN - 0740-0020
VL - 112
SP - 104236
JO - FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
JF - FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
M1 - 104236
ER -