TY - JOUR
T1 - COVID-19 and policies for care homes in the first wave of the pandemic in European welfare states
T2 - Too little, too late?
AU - Daly, Mary
AU - León, Margarita
AU - Pfau-Effinger, Birgit
AU - Ranci, Costanzo
AU - Rostgaard, Tine
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - This article examines COVID-19 and residential care for older people during the first wave of the pandemic in 2020, comparing a range of countries – Denmark, England, Germany, Italy and Spain – to identify the policy approaches taken to the virus in care homes and set these in institutional and policy context. Pandemic policies towards care homes are compared in terms of lockdown, testing and the supply of personal protective equipment. The comparative analysis shows a clear cross-national clustering: Denmark and Germany group together by virtue of the proactive approach adopted, whereas England, Italy and Spain had major weaknesses resulting in delayed and generally inadequate responses. The article goes on to show that these outcomes and country clustering are embedded in particular long-term care (LTC) policy systems. The factors that we highlight as especially important in differentiating the countries are the resourcing of the sector, the regulation of LTC and care homes, and the degree of vertical (and to a lesser extent horizontal) coordination in the sector and between it and the health sector.
AB - This article examines COVID-19 and residential care for older people during the first wave of the pandemic in 2020, comparing a range of countries – Denmark, England, Germany, Italy and Spain – to identify the policy approaches taken to the virus in care homes and set these in institutional and policy context. Pandemic policies towards care homes are compared in terms of lockdown, testing and the supply of personal protective equipment. The comparative analysis shows a clear cross-national clustering: Denmark and Germany group together by virtue of the proactive approach adopted, whereas England, Italy and Spain had major weaknesses resulting in delayed and generally inadequate responses. The article goes on to show that these outcomes and country clustering are embedded in particular long-term care (LTC) policy systems. The factors that we highlight as especially important in differentiating the countries are the resourcing of the sector, the regulation of LTC and care homes, and the degree of vertical (and to a lesser extent horizontal) coordination in the sector and between it and the health sector.
KW - care homes
KW - COVID-19
KW - Denmark
KW - England
KW - Germany
KW - Italy
KW - long-term care policy
KW - Spain
KW - welfare state comparison
KW - Long Term Care
KW - Welfare state research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121819853&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/09589287211055672
DO - 10.1177/09589287211055672
M3 - Article
C2 - 35185298
AN - SCOPUS:85121819853
SN - 0958-9287
JO - Journal of European social policy
JF - Journal of European social policy
ER -