TY - JOUR
T1 - Archaeology in 2022: Counter‐myths for hopeful futures
AU - Berihuete‐Azorín, Marian
AU - Blackmore, Chelsea
AU - Borck, Lewis
AU - Flexner, James L.
AU - Frieman, Catherine J.
AU - Herrmann, Corey A.
AU - Kiddey, Rachael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. American Anthropologist published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Anthropological Association.
PY - 2023/11/10
Y1 - 2023/11/10
N2 - Archaeology in 2022 features more calls than ever for a socially and politically engaged, progressive discipline. Archaeologists increasingly respect and integrate decolonizing and Indigenous knowledge in theory and practice. They acknowledge and embrace the fluidity and diversity of sexes and genders, past and present. They document patterns of migration, ancient as well as contemporary, to combat retrograde and racist narratives that remain pervasive in the public sphere. At the same time, the field has a deep-seated conservative bastion toward which many scholars retreat, arguing for an “objective” past that is free of political implications or interpretive ambiguity. As anarchist archaeologists, we see the myth of the objective past as one of many interconnected myths that have provided the basis for an archaeology that reifies and proliferates the current social order. We deconstruct myths relating to capitalist and colonialist ideologies of “human nature,” the assumed inevitability of the current order, and fatalistic commitment to dystopian or utopian futures. As alternatives, we present counter-myths that emphasize the contingent and political nature of archaeological praxis, the creative and collaborative foundation of communities, the alternative orders that archaeology uncovers, and the role of a hopeful past for constructing the possibilities of different futures.
AB - Archaeology in 2022 features more calls than ever for a socially and politically engaged, progressive discipline. Archaeologists increasingly respect and integrate decolonizing and Indigenous knowledge in theory and practice. They acknowledge and embrace the fluidity and diversity of sexes and genders, past and present. They document patterns of migration, ancient as well as contemporary, to combat retrograde and racist narratives that remain pervasive in the public sphere. At the same time, the field has a deep-seated conservative bastion toward which many scholars retreat, arguing for an “objective” past that is free of political implications or interpretive ambiguity. As anarchist archaeologists, we see the myth of the objective past as one of many interconnected myths that have provided the basis for an archaeology that reifies and proliferates the current social order. We deconstruct myths relating to capitalist and colonialist ideologies of “human nature,” the assumed inevitability of the current order, and fatalistic commitment to dystopian or utopian futures. As alternatives, we present counter-myths that emphasize the contingent and political nature of archaeological praxis, the creative and collaborative foundation of communities, the alternative orders that archaeology uncovers, and the role of a hopeful past for constructing the possibilities of different futures.
KW - anarchist archaeologies
KW - capitalism
KW - climate disaster
KW - colonialism
KW - counter-narrative
KW - futures
KW - migration
KW - multispecies
KW - myth
KW - Anarchist archaeologies
KW - Futures
KW - Myth
KW - Migration
KW - Capitalism
KW - Counter-narrative
KW - Multispecies
KW - Colonialism
KW - Climate disaster
UR - https://ddd.uab.cat/record/284749
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85176771712
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/2d1db0a3-c1da-36f9-bd25-8b0ae9ec21f8/
U2 - 10.1111/aman.13940
DO - 10.1111/aman.13940
M3 - Article
SN - 1548-1433
JO - American Anthropologist
JF - American Anthropologist
ER -