TY - JOUR
T1 - A qualitative study on a decision aid for breast cancer screening: Views from women and health professionals
AU - Toledo-Chávarri, A.
AU - Rué, M.
AU - Codern-Bové, N.
AU - Carles-Lavila, M.
AU - Perestelo-Pérez, L.
AU - Pérez-Lacasta, M. J.
AU - Feijoo-Cid, M.
AU - Cardona, Àngels
AU - García, Montse
AU - Vidal, Carmen
AU - Buil, Sara
AU - Martínez-Alonso, Montserrat
AU - Ortega, Marta
AU - Pla, Sandra
AU - Pons, Anna
AU - Soler, Jorge
AU - Vinyals, Clara
AU - Vinyals, Laia
AU - Carles, Misericòrdia
AU - Pla, Roger
AU - Burón, Andrea
AU - Castells, Xavier
AU - Romero, Anabel
AU - Sala, Maria
PY - 2017/5/1
Y1 - 2017/5/1
N2 - © 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd This qualitative study evaluates a decision aid that includes the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening and analyses women's perception of the information received and healthcare professionals’ perceptions of the convenience of providing it. Seven focus groups of women aged 40–69 years (n = 39) and two groups of healthcare professionals (n = 23) were conducted in Catalonia and the Canary Islands. The focus groups consisted of guided discussions regarding decision-making about breast cancer screening, and acceptability and feasibility of the decision aid. A content analysis was performed. Women positively value receiving information regarding the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening. Several women had difficulties understanding some concepts, especially those regarding overdiagnosis. Women preferred to share the decisions on screening with healthcare professionals. The professionals noted the lack of inclusion of some harms and benefits in the decision aid, and proposed improving the clarity of the statistical information. The information on overdiagnosis generates confusion among women and controversy among professionals. Faced with the new information presented by the decision aid, the majority of women prefer shared decision-making; however, its feasibility might be limited by a lack of knowledge and attitudes of rejection from healthcare professionals.
AB - © 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd This qualitative study evaluates a decision aid that includes the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening and analyses women's perception of the information received and healthcare professionals’ perceptions of the convenience of providing it. Seven focus groups of women aged 40–69 years (n = 39) and two groups of healthcare professionals (n = 23) were conducted in Catalonia and the Canary Islands. The focus groups consisted of guided discussions regarding decision-making about breast cancer screening, and acceptability and feasibility of the decision aid. A content analysis was performed. Women positively value receiving information regarding the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening. Several women had difficulties understanding some concepts, especially those regarding overdiagnosis. Women preferred to share the decisions on screening with healthcare professionals. The professionals noted the lack of inclusion of some harms and benefits in the decision aid, and proposed improving the clarity of the statistical information. The information on overdiagnosis generates confusion among women and controversy among professionals. Faced with the new information presented by the decision aid, the majority of women prefer shared decision-making; however, its feasibility might be limited by a lack of knowledge and attitudes of rejection from healthcare professionals.
KW - breast cancer screening
KW - decision aid
KW - decision-making
KW - patients’ information
U2 - 10.1111/ecc.12660
DO - 10.1111/ecc.12660
M3 - Article
SN - 0961-5423
VL - 26
JO - European Journal of Cancer Care
JF - European Journal of Cancer Care
IS - 3
M1 - e12660
ER -