A Delphi consensus statement for digital surgery

Kyle Lam, Michael D. Abràmoff, José M. Balibrea, Steven M. Bishop, Richard R. Brady, Rachael A. Callcut, Manish Chand, Justin W. Collins, Markus K. Diener, Matthias Eisenmann, Kelly Fermont, Manoel Galvao Neto, Gregory D. Hager, Robert J. Hinchliffe, Alan Horgan, Pierre Jannin, Alexander Langerman, Kartik Logishetty, Amit Mahadik, Lena Maier-HeinEsteban Martín Antona, Pietro Mascagni, Ryan K. Mathew, Beat P. Müller-Stich, Thomas Neumuth, Felix Nickel, Adrian Park, Gianluca Pellino, Frank Rudzicz, Sam Shah, Mark Slack, Myles J. Smith, Naeem Soomro, Stefanie Speidel, Danail Stoyanov, Henry S. Tilney, Martin Wagner, Ara Darzi, James M. Kinross*, Sanjay Purkayastha

*Autor correspondiente de este trabajo

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículoInvestigaciónrevisión exhaustiva

50 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

The use of digital technology is increasing rapidly across surgical specialities, yet there is no consensus for the term ‘digital surgery’. This is critical as digital health technologies present technical, governance, and legal challenges which are unique to the surgeon and surgical patient. We aim to define the term digital surgery and the ethical issues surrounding its clinical application, and to identify barriers and research goals for future practice. 38 international experts, across the fields of surgery, AI, industry, law, ethics and policy, participated in a four-round Delphi exercise. Issues were generated by an expert panel and public panel through a scoping questionnaire around key themes identified from the literature and voted upon in two subsequent questionnaire rounds. Consensus was defined if >70% of the panel deemed the statement important and
Idioma originalInglés
Número de artículo100
Número de páginas9
Publicaciónnpj Digital Medicine
Volumen5
N.º1
DOI
EstadoPublicada - dic 2022

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'A Delphi consensus statement for digital surgery'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto