More human than human: aspects of monstrosity in the films and novels in english of the 1980s and 1990s

Abstract

The crucial function of the monster as mankind's Other has always found an expression in culture since the dawn of civilisation and, so, monstrosity has frequently occupied a central position in the diverse cultural periods of the past. By the end of the twentieth century, the ubiquitous presence of the monster appears to be one of the most conspicuous features of contemporary Western culture in its widest sense. The monster thrives in particular in the novels and films in English of the 1980s and 1990s. Nevertheless, monstrosity has been only discussed within English Cultural Studies mostly in work dealing with horror fiction, especially with the horror film. Researchers such as Andrew Tudor in Monsters and Mad Scientists (1989), Noël Carroll in The Philosophy of Horror (1990), David Skal in The Monster Show (1993) and Barbara Creed in The Monstrous-Feminine (1993) have written perceptive analyses of the monster in that genre. Yet, there is no available discourse on monstrosity itself, understood as a complex cultural construction that gathers together the widely different types of monster and that is present in most contemporary cultural manifestations beyond the domain of horror films. It is the aim of this dissertation to start filling this gap, beginning first by questioning the idea that monstrosity is represented essentially by the repulsive creatures that can be found in horror films and second, by looking at the monster from a more comprehensive point of view which includes the two most popular vehicles for fiction today: films and novels. Regarding monstrosity itself, this dissertation disregards a traditional classificatory standpoint that would limit analysis to drawing lists of examples. Instead, this dissertation opens new ground for cultural analysis within Cultural Studies by considering together the representations of fictional monstrosity: human and non-human, aesthetic and moral, mythical and political. The monster is, thus, studied within the context of master narratives that express the main cultural tensions in our time and that justify the division into chapters of my dissertation. The fictional monster is a symptom of these tensions but it is also part of the strategies used by the human psyche to heal the wounds inflicted on its self-esteem by the monstrous reality of human behaviour. The chapters are: 1 Fascinating Bodies: The New Iconography of Monstrosity; 2 Old Monsters, New Monsters: Vision and Re-Vision From Screen Adaptation to Novelization; 3 Nostalgia for the Monster: Mythical Monsters and Freaks; 4 Evil and Monstrosity: The Moral Monster, 5 The Politics of Monstrosity: The Monsters of Power; 6: Frankenstein's Capitalist Heirs: The Uses of Making Monsters; 7 Gendered Monstrosity: The Monstrous-Feminine and the New Woman Saviour and 8 Little Monsters?: Children and Monsters. The dissertation also include an extensive list of primary sources (novels and films).

Date of Award	3 Oct 1996
Original language	Undefined/Unknown
Supervisor	Andrew Monnickendam Findlay (Director)