Who promotes sustainability? Five theses on the relationships between the degrowth and the environmental justice movements

Bengi Akbulut, Federico Demaria, Julien François Gerber, Joan Martínez-Alier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearch

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

© 2019 Elsevier B.V. Environmental destructions, overconsumption and overdevelopment are felt by an increasing number of people. Voices for ‘prosperity without growth’ have strengthened and environmental conflicts are on the rise worldwide. This introduction to the special issue explores the possibility of an alliance between post-growth and ecological distribution conflicts (EDCs). It argues that among the various branches of post-growth and EDCs, degrowth and environmental justice (EJ) movements have the best potential to interconnect. This claim is discussed via five ‘theses’: We argue that both degrowth and EJ movements are materialist but also more than just materialist in scope (thesis I) and both seek a politico-metabolic reconfiguration of our economies (thesis II). We also show that both degrowth and EJ seek consequential as well as deontological justice (thesis III) and they are complementary: while EJ has not developed a unified and broader theoretical roadmap, degrowth has largely failed to connect with a wider social movement (thesis IV). Finally, both degrowth and EJ stress the contradiction between capitalist accumulation vs. conditions of social reproduction (rather than that between capital and labour) (thesis V). We conclude that an alliance between degrowth and EJ is not only possible but necessary.
Original languageEnglish
Article number106418
JournalEcological Economics
Volume165
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2019

Keywords

  • Ecological distribution conflict
  • Environmental conflicts
  • Environmental politics
  • Post-growth

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Who promotes sustainability? Five theses on the relationships between the degrowth and the environmental justice movements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this