Which Nontraditional Outcomes Should Be Measured in Healthcare Decision-Making in Schizophrenia? A Systematic Review

Ana Vieta, Xavier Badia, Enric Álvarez, José A. Sacristán

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: This article aims to define the utility of nontraditional outcomes (NTOs) in healthcare decision-making in schizophrenia. DESIGN AND METHODS: A systematic review of studies published between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2008, was performed. A 10-point evidence-based utility index (UI) was used to assess the utility of NTOs: high (UI: 7.5-10), medium (UI: ≥5 to <7.5), and low (UI: <5) utility. FINDINGS: Of 736 citations identified, 94 met inclusion criteria. One hundred ninety-four NTOs were identified (patient reported outcomes [38.7%] and economic outcomes [61.3%]). Of these, 68 (35.1%) were appropriate for decision making. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Numerous NTOs with low utility in schizophrenia are being used for healthcare policy and clinical care by policy makers, managers, and healthcare professionals. Medium and low utility NTOs should be used with caution. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)198-207
JournalPerspectives in Psychiatric Care
Volume48
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2012

Keywords

  • Decision-making
  • Nontraditional outcomes
  • Schizophrenia

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Which Nontraditional Outcomes Should Be Measured in Healthcare Decision-Making in Schizophrenia? A Systematic Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this