What’s in a pipe? NATO’s confrontation on the 1962 large-diameter pipe embargo

Roberto Cantoni*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

By the late 1950s, the Soviet Union had acquired a strong position as a world oil exporter, thanks to major discoveries in the Ural-Volga area. In order to transport their oil to strategic areas within the Union and to Europe, the Soviets devised a project to build a colossal pipeline system. This plan caused anxiety at NATO since Russian oil could be wielded as a weapon to weaken the West both militarily and economically. In order to complete the system, however, the Soviets needed large-diameter steel pipes and equipment, which they had to import from the West. Thus in 1961 the U.S. delegation at NATO proposed a comprehensive embargo of largediameter pipes in order to delay the system’s construction. I argue that the definition of what oil pipes were as technological artifacts, as well as their final content, was ultimately shaped by the NATO debate on this U.S. proposition.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-96
Number of pages30
JournalTechnology and Culture
Volume58
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What’s in a pipe? NATO’s confrontation on the 1962 large-diameter pipe embargo'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this