What R<inf>K</inf> and Q <inf>5</inf> can tell us about New Physics in b→sℓℓ transitions?

Marcel Algueró; Bernat Capdevila; Sébastien Descotes-Genon; Pere Masjuan; Joaquim Matias

doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2019)096

What R<inf>K</inf> and Q <inf>5</inf> can tell us about New Physics in b→sℓℓ transitions?

Marcel Algueró, Bernat Capdevila, Sébastien Descotes-Genon, Pere Masjuan, Joaquim Matias

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

© 2019, The Author(s). The deviations with respect to the Standard Model that are currently observed in b → sℓℓ transitions, or B anomalies, can be interpreted in terms of different New Physics (NP) scenarios within a model-independent effective approach. We identify a set of internal tensions of the fit that require further attention and whose theoretical or experimental nature could be determined with more data. In this landscape of NP, we discuss possible ways to discriminate among favoured NP hypotheses in the short term thanks to current and forthcoming observables. While an update of RK should help to disentangle the type of NP we may be observing (Lepton-Flavour Universality Violating and/or Lepton Flavour Universal), additional observables, in particular Q5, turn out to be central to determine which NP hypothesis should be preferred. We also analyse the preferences shown by the current global fit concerning various NP hypotheses, using two different tools: the behaviour of the pulls of individual observables under NP scenarios and the directions favoured by approximate quadratic parametrisations of the observables in terms of Wilson coefficients.

Original language	English
Article number	96
Journal	Journal of High Energy Physics
Volume	2019
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2019)096
Publication status	Published - 1 Jul 2019

Keywords

Beyond Standard Model
Effective Field Theories
Heavy Quark Physics

Access to Document

10.1007/JHEP07(2019)096

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'What R<inf>K</inf> and Q <inf>5</inf> can tell us about New Physics in b→sℓℓ transitions?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{cd4033a2435d4b7cac00470e994cb45d,

title = "What RK and Q 5 can tell us about New Physics in b→sℓℓ transitions?",

abstract = "{\textcopyright} 2019, The Author(s). The deviations with respect to the Standard Model that are currently observed in b → sℓℓ transitions, or B anomalies, can be interpreted in terms of different New Physics (NP) scenarios within a model-independent effective approach. We identify a set of internal tensions of the fit that require further attention and whose theoretical or experimental nature could be determined with more data. In this landscape of NP, we discuss possible ways to discriminate among favoured NP hypotheses in the short term thanks to current and forthcoming observables. While an update of RK should help to disentangle the type of NP we may be observing (Lepton-Flavour Universality Violating and/or Lepton Flavour Universal), additional observables, in particular Q5, turn out to be central to determine which NP hypothesis should be preferred. We also analyse the preferences shown by the current global fit concerning various NP hypotheses, using two different tools: the behaviour of the pulls of individual observables under NP scenarios and the directions favoured by approximate quadratic parametrisations of the observables in terms of Wilson coefficients.",

keywords = "Beyond Standard Model, Effective Field Theories, Heavy Quark Physics",

author = "Marcel Alguer{\'o} and Bernat Capdevila and S{\'e}bastien Descotes-Genon and Pere Masjuan and Joaquim Matias",

year = "2019",

month = jul,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/JHEP07(2019)096",

language = "English",

volume = "2019",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What RK and Q 5 can tell us about New Physics in b→sℓℓ transitions?

AU - Algueró, Marcel

AU - Capdevila, Bernat

AU - Descotes-Genon, Sébastien

AU - Masjuan, Pere

AU - Matias, Joaquim

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - © 2019, The Author(s). The deviations with respect to the Standard Model that are currently observed in b → sℓℓ transitions, or B anomalies, can be interpreted in terms of different New Physics (NP) scenarios within a model-independent effective approach. We identify a set of internal tensions of the fit that require further attention and whose theoretical or experimental nature could be determined with more data. In this landscape of NP, we discuss possible ways to discriminate among favoured NP hypotheses in the short term thanks to current and forthcoming observables. While an update of RK should help to disentangle the type of NP we may be observing (Lepton-Flavour Universality Violating and/or Lepton Flavour Universal), additional observables, in particular Q5, turn out to be central to determine which NP hypothesis should be preferred. We also analyse the preferences shown by the current global fit concerning various NP hypotheses, using two different tools: the behaviour of the pulls of individual observables under NP scenarios and the directions favoured by approximate quadratic parametrisations of the observables in terms of Wilson coefficients.

AB - © 2019, The Author(s). The deviations with respect to the Standard Model that are currently observed in b → sℓℓ transitions, or B anomalies, can be interpreted in terms of different New Physics (NP) scenarios within a model-independent effective approach. We identify a set of internal tensions of the fit that require further attention and whose theoretical or experimental nature could be determined with more data. In this landscape of NP, we discuss possible ways to discriminate among favoured NP hypotheses in the short term thanks to current and forthcoming observables. While an update of RK should help to disentangle the type of NP we may be observing (Lepton-Flavour Universality Violating and/or Lepton Flavour Universal), additional observables, in particular Q5, turn out to be central to determine which NP hypothesis should be preferred. We also analyse the preferences shown by the current global fit concerning various NP hypotheses, using two different tools: the behaviour of the pulls of individual observables under NP scenarios and the directions favoured by approximate quadratic parametrisations of the observables in terms of Wilson coefficients.

KW - Beyond Standard Model

KW - Effective Field Theories

KW - Heavy Quark Physics

U2 - 10.1007/JHEP07(2019)096

DO - 10.1007/JHEP07(2019)096

M3 - Article

VL - 2019

M1 - 96

ER -