TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of the Natural Outdoor Environment in Different Populations in Europe in Relation to Access
T2 - Implications for Policy
AU - Masterson, Daniel
AU - Triguero-Mas, Margarita
AU - Marquez, Sandra
AU - Zijlema, Wilma
AU - Martinez, David
AU - Gidlow, Christopher
AU - Smith, Graham
AU - Hurst, Gemma
AU - Cirach, Marta
AU - Grazuleviciene, Regina
AU - Van den Berg, Magdalena
AU - Kruize, Hanneke
AU - Maas, Jolanda
AU - Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2022/2/16
Y1 - 2022/2/16
N2 - This cross-cultural study explores the relationship of natural outdoor environment (NOE) use with NOE access. Most urban planning recommendations suggest optimal accessibility to be 300 m–500 m straight distance to spaces with vegetation of at least 1 hectare. Exploring this recommendation, we used data (n = 3947) from four European cities collected in the framework of the PHENOTYPE study: Barcelona (Spain), Doetinchem (The Netherlands), Kaunas (Lithuania) and Stoke-on-Trent (United Kingdom) to obtain residential access to NOE (straight or network distances, using 300 m and 150 m buffers, to NOE larger than 1 hectare or 0.5 hectare) and use of NOE (i.e., self-reported time spent in NOE). Poisson regression models were used to examine the associations between residential access and use of NOE. The models with the strongest association with time spent in NOE in the combined sample were for those living within 300 m straight line distance to either 0.5 ha or 1 ha NOE. Noting that the only indicator that was consistent across all individual cities was living with 150 m network buffer of NOE (of at least 1 ha), this warrants further exploration in reducing recommendations of 300 m straight-line distance to 150 m network distance to 1 ha of NOE for a general indicator for cities within Europe.
AB - This cross-cultural study explores the relationship of natural outdoor environment (NOE) use with NOE access. Most urban planning recommendations suggest optimal accessibility to be 300 m–500 m straight distance to spaces with vegetation of at least 1 hectare. Exploring this recommendation, we used data (n = 3947) from four European cities collected in the framework of the PHENOTYPE study: Barcelona (Spain), Doetinchem (The Netherlands), Kaunas (Lithuania) and Stoke-on-Trent (United Kingdom) to obtain residential access to NOE (straight or network distances, using 300 m and 150 m buffers, to NOE larger than 1 hectare or 0.5 hectare) and use of NOE (i.e., self-reported time spent in NOE). Poisson regression models were used to examine the associations between residential access and use of NOE. The models with the strongest association with time spent in NOE in the combined sample were for those living within 300 m straight line distance to either 0.5 ha or 1 ha NOE. Noting that the only indicator that was consistent across all individual cities was living with 150 m network buffer of NOE (of at least 1 ha), this warrants further exploration in reducing recommendations of 300 m straight-line distance to 150 m network distance to 1 ha of NOE for a general indicator for cities within Europe.
KW - Access
KW - Distance
KW - Green space
KW - Natural outdoor environments
KW - Time spent
KW - Use
KW - access
KW - distance
KW - Green space
KW - Natural outdoor environments
KW - Time spent
KW - use
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124582982&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/6e2f0edb-763c-381e-911c-dccfcc6353e8/
UR - https://portalrecerca.uab.cat/en/publications/cf2864e7-e628-4952-93a1-526b3e8d8b39
U2 - 10.3390/ijerph19042226
DO - 10.3390/ijerph19042226
M3 - Article
C2 - 35206413
AN - SCOPUS:85124582982
VL - 19
IS - 4
M1 - 2226
ER -