Use of expert consensus to improve atherogenic dyslipidemia management

Jesús Millan Nuñez-Cortés, Juan Pedro-Botet, Ángel Brea-Hernando, Ángel Díaz-Rodríguez, Pedro González-Santos, Antonio Hernández-Mijares, Teresa Mantilla-Morató, Xavier Pintó-Sala, Rafael Simó

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)


Introduction and objectives Although atherogenic dyslipidemia is a recognized cardiovascular risk factor, it is often underassessed and thus undertreated and poorly controlled in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to reach a multidisciplinary consensus for the establishment of a set of clinical recommendations on atherogenic dyslipidemia to optimize its prevention, early detection, diagnostic evaluation, therapeutic approach, and follow-up. Methods After a review of the scientific evidence, a scientific committee formulated 87 recommendations related to atherogenic dyslipidemia, which were grouped into 5 subject areas: general concepts (10 items), impact and epidemiology (4 items), cardiovascular risk (32 items), detection and diagnosis (19 items), and treatment (22 items). A 2-round modified Delphi method was conducted to compare the opinions of a panel of 65 specialists in cardiology (23%), endocrinology (24.6%), family medicine (27.7%), and internal medicine (24.6%) on these issues. Results After the first round, the panel reached consensus on 65 of the 87 items discussed, and agreed on 76 items by the end of the second round. Insufficient consensus was reached on 3 items related to the detection and diagnosis of atherogenic dyslipidemia and 3 items related to the therapeutic goals to be achieved in these patients. Conclusions The external assessment conducted by experts on atherogenic dyslipidemia showed a high level of professional agreement with the proposed clinical recommendations. These recommendations represent a useful tool for improving the clinical management of patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia. A detailed analysis of the current scientific evidence is required for those statements that eluded consensus. © 2013 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)36-44
JournalRevista Espanola de Cardiologia
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014


  • Atherogenic dyslipidemia
  • Cardiovascular risk
  • Consensus
  • Delphi


Dive into the research topics of 'Use of expert consensus to improve atherogenic dyslipidemia management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this