TY - JOUR
T1 - Urban horticulture in retail parks: Environmental assessment of the potential implementation of rooftop greenhouses in European and South American cities
AU - Sanyé-Mengual, Esther
AU - Martinez-Blanco, Julia
AU - Finkbeiner, Matthias
AU - Cerdà, Marc
AU - Camargo, Miria
AU - Ometto, Aldo R.
AU - Velásquez, Luz Stella
AU - Villada, German
AU - Niza, Samuel
AU - Pina, André
AU - Ferreira, Gonçalo
AU - Oliver-Solà, Jordi
AU - Montero, Juan Ignacio
AU - Rieradevall, Joan
PY - 2016/10/25
Y1 - 2016/10/25
N2 - © 2017 Elsevier Ltd This paper performs a multi-national assessment to provide a more comprehensive vision of the potential implementation of Rooftop Greenhouses in retail parks from a theoretical perspective. A geographic information system – life cycle assessment method is used to quantify both the potential and the expected benefits of implementing rooftop greenhouses. We evaluate eight case studies in Europe and South America, paying attention to geographical constrasts (e.g., climate). We also focus on comparing the differences between isolated rooftop greenhouses and integrated rooftop greenhouses by evaluating the implications of a symbiotic metabolism. Results showed that retail parks have a large potential for the implementation of rooftop greenhouses in the short-term (53–98% of the rooftops are technically and economically feasible), being architecture one of the main constraints (i.e., roof material limited the potential to 11% for the Colombian case). Retail parks performed better than industrial parks as urban locations for such projects. The employment of isolated rooftop greenhouses in these areas obtained large values of production (31–234 tonnes of tomato per ha), CO2 savings (16–112 tonnes of CO2 eq per ha) and food self-supply (380–21,500 people per ha; 3.5–60% of local tomato demand). When considering an industrial symbiosis approach, integrated rooftop greenhouses (with exchange of energy and CO2) could boost food production and self-supply values (up to 1.8 times) as well as the environmental benefits from local production (up to 2.5 times higher). Integrating the water flow from rainwater harvesting on the building into the crop production would ensure crop's water self-sufficiency, apart from one case (69% of self-sufficiency).
AB - © 2017 Elsevier Ltd This paper performs a multi-national assessment to provide a more comprehensive vision of the potential implementation of Rooftop Greenhouses in retail parks from a theoretical perspective. A geographic information system – life cycle assessment method is used to quantify both the potential and the expected benefits of implementing rooftop greenhouses. We evaluate eight case studies in Europe and South America, paying attention to geographical constrasts (e.g., climate). We also focus on comparing the differences between isolated rooftop greenhouses and integrated rooftop greenhouses by evaluating the implications of a symbiotic metabolism. Results showed that retail parks have a large potential for the implementation of rooftop greenhouses in the short-term (53–98% of the rooftops are technically and economically feasible), being architecture one of the main constraints (i.e., roof material limited the potential to 11% for the Colombian case). Retail parks performed better than industrial parks as urban locations for such projects. The employment of isolated rooftop greenhouses in these areas obtained large values of production (31–234 tonnes of tomato per ha), CO2 savings (16–112 tonnes of CO2 eq per ha) and food self-supply (380–21,500 people per ha; 3.5–60% of local tomato demand). When considering an industrial symbiosis approach, integrated rooftop greenhouses (with exchange of energy and CO2) could boost food production and self-supply values (up to 1.8 times) as well as the environmental benefits from local production (up to 2.5 times higher). Integrating the water flow from rainwater harvesting on the building into the crop production would ensure crop's water self-sufficiency, apart from one case (69% of self-sufficiency).
KW - Ecoinnovation
KW - Food security
KW - Industrial ecology
KW - Local production
KW - Urban agriculture
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.103
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.103
M3 - Article
SN - 0959-6526
VL - 172
SP - 3081
EP - 3091
JO - Journal of Cleaner Production
JF - Journal of Cleaner Production
ER -