TY - JOUR
T1 - Transformation beyond conservation
T2 - how critical social science can contribute to a radical new agenda in biodiversity conservation
AU - Massarella, Kate
AU - Nygren, Anja
AU - Fletcher, Robert
AU - Büscher, Bram
AU - Kiwango, Wilhelm A.
AU - Komi, Sanna
AU - Krauss, Judith E.
AU - Mabele, Mathew B.
AU - McInturff, Alex
AU - Sandroni, Laila T.
AU - Alagona, Peter S.
AU - Brockington, Dan
AU - Coates, Robert
AU - Duffy, Rosaleen
AU - Ferraz, Katia M.P.M.B.
AU - Koot, Stasja
AU - Marchini, Silvio
AU - Percequillo, Alexandre R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Multiple proposals for transforming biodiversity conservation have been put forward, yet critical exploration of how transformative change is conceptualised in this context is lacking. Drawing on transformations to sustainability scholarship, we review recent proposals for transformative change in biodiversity conservation, considering the suggested goals and means of transformation. We outline the crucial role for critical social scientific inquiry in transformative change by highlighting two core contributions. First, critical social science is an analytical device that politicises and pluralises debates and second, it can help facililitate the identification of transformative alternatives. We then show how such a critical social science approach is operationalised within the CONVIVA (Towards Convivial Conservation: Governing Human-Wildlife Interactions in the Anthropocene) project to pursue transformative change in biodiversity conservation.
AB - Multiple proposals for transforming biodiversity conservation have been put forward, yet critical exploration of how transformative change is conceptualised in this context is lacking. Drawing on transformations to sustainability scholarship, we review recent proposals for transformative change in biodiversity conservation, considering the suggested goals and means of transformation. We outline the crucial role for critical social scientific inquiry in transformative change by highlighting two core contributions. First, critical social science is an analytical device that politicises and pluralises debates and second, it can help facililitate the identification of transformative alternatives. We then show how such a critical social science approach is operationalised within the CONVIVA (Towards Convivial Conservation: Governing Human-Wildlife Interactions in the Anthropocene) project to pursue transformative change in biodiversity conservation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104111709&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2021.03.005
DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2021.03.005
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85104111709
SN - 1877-3435
VL - 49
SP - 79
EP - 87
JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
ER -
