Three measures of physical rehabilitation effectiveness in elderly patients: a prospective, longitudinal, comparative analysis

Dolores Sánchez-Rodríguez, Ramon Miralles, Josep M. Muniesa, Sergio Mojal, Anna Abadía-Escartín, Olga Vázquez-Ibar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

© 2015 Sánchez-Rodríguez et al. Background: Rehabilitation success is measured by instruments that assess performance of activities of daily living. Guidelines on the use and choice of these instruments are lacking. The present study aimed to analyse prognostic indicators of physical rehabilitation effectiveness in elderly patients according to three rehabilitation impact indices. Methods: Prospective, longitudinal study in a post-acute care unit. The study included rehabilitation-eligible deconditioned elderly in-patients prospectively admitted to post-acute care (n = 685, aged 83.2 ± 8.3 years, mean length of stay 15 ± 9.2 days). Data Collection: Premorbid health status variables (PHSV): age, sex, comorbidity (Charlson index), medical history (heart failure, pulmonary disease, cerebrovascular disease, dementia), previous living situation and pre-admission functional status (premorbid Lawton and Barthel indices). Admission health status variables (AHSV): main diagnoses, referral source, physical (Barthel-adm) and cognitive function (Pfeiffer test), undernutrition and dysphagia. Outcome Measures: Absolute functional gain (AFG, admission-to-discharge Barthel change), relative functional gain (RFG, achieved percentage of potential gain) and rehabilitation efficiency index (REI, AFG over length of stay). Univariate analysis considered these parameters, along with PHSV and AHSV. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed for AFG ≥20, RFG ≥35 % and REI ≥ 0.50. Results: Greater AFG was associated with 14 variables, 8 PHSV (57.1 %) and 6 AHSV (42.8 %); greater RFG with 9 variables, 3 PHSV (33.3 %) and 6 AHSV (66.6 %); and REI with 9 variables, 4 PHSV (44.4 %) and 5 AHSV (55.5 %). Mean AFG value was 34.5 ± 15.8 in patients who achieved complete recovery (RFG 100 %, n = 189, 27.5 %) and 35.3 ± 15.0 (p = 0.593) in the remaining patients (n = 311, 45.4 %). In multivariate analysis, only Barthel-adm was related to all three rehabilitation impact indices. Conclusions: Both premorbid and acute-process variables have a greater impact on AFG and REI, compared to RFG. Although AFG gives information about the degree of reduction in dependence, it does not provide clinical information about post-rehabilitation functional status (mean AFG values did not differ between patients with and without complete recovery). A future implication for evaluating rehabilitation effectiveness in elderly patients is to recommend RFG corrected by premorbid Barthel score, which is less affected by previous health conditions, as the optimum method to assess the degree to which maximum potential improvement was achieved.
Original languageEnglish
Article number138
JournalBMC Geriatrics
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Oct 2015

Keywords

  • Elderly
  • Functional recovery
  • Geriatric rehabilitation
  • Post-acute
  • Rehabilitation impact index

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Three measures of physical rehabilitation effectiveness in elderly patients: a prospective, longitudinal, comparative analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Sánchez-Rodríguez, D., Miralles, R., Muniesa, J. M., Mojal, S., Abadía-Escartín, A., & Vázquez-Ibar, O. (2015). Three measures of physical rehabilitation effectiveness in elderly patients: a prospective, longitudinal, comparative analysis. BMC Geriatrics, 15(1), [138]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0138-5