The world is a room: Beyond centers and peripheries in the global production of anthropological knowledge

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    It is well accepted that the discussion about intellectual centers and peripheries has a reductionist character that conceals the complexity of a globalizing world. Despite this, we cannot ignore that in the academic history of anthropology central traditions and hegemonic discourses were established, while others were rendered as peripheral or marginal. This historical context has set a disciplinary framework of inequalities and imbalances that created the conditions of possibility for the global production and dissemination of anthropological knowledge. By re-examining the controversy surrounding the anthropology of the Mediterranean and its relation with debates about native anthropology, this article points out the challenge of revising this disciplinary framework in the project of developing a truly global anthropology.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)8-19
    JournalFocaal
    Issue number63
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 17 Sep 2012

    Keywords

    • Anthropological knowledge
    • Center-periphery
    • Disciplinary frameworks
    • Global anthropology

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The world is a room: Beyond centers and peripheries in the global production of anthropological knowledge'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this