The Roman High-and Low-Avoidance rat strains differ in fear-potentiated startle and classical aversive conditioning

Lydia Gimenez-Llort, Adolf Tobeña, Alberto Fernández-Teruel, Regina López Aumatell, Glòria Blázquez Romero, Francisco Luis Gil Moncayo, Raúl Aguilar Heras, Antoni Cañete Ramírez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The Swiss sublines of Roman High-(RHA/Verh) and Low-(RLA/Verh) Avoidance rats have been genetically selected (and outbred) since 1972 because of their good versus extremely poor acquisition of two-way, active avoidance. Inbred strains (RHA-I and RLA-I), derived from those two lines, have been maintained at our laboratory since 1997. The RLA line/strain shows increased stress-induced endocrine responses and enhanced anxiety/fearfulness in a variety of unconditioned behavioural variables and tests. Thus far, however, the Roman rat strains have not been compared in procedures involving classical fear conditioning to cues or contexts. Therefore, the present work was aimed at comparing RHA-I and RLA-I rats in 1) two different procedures of fear-potentiated startle and 2) in a classical fear conditioning (i.e., conditioned freezing) paradigm. The results indicate that, compared to RHA-I rats, RLA-I animals display higher levels of conditioned fear (as measured either by startle responses or freezing behavior) across those different tasks
Translated title of the contributionCepas de ratas Roman de alta y baja evitación difieren en respuesta de sobresalto potenciada por miedo y en condicionamiento clásico aversivo
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)0027-32
Number of pages6
JournalPsicothema
Volume1
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Roman High-and Low-Avoidance rat strains differ in fear-potentiated startle and classical aversive conditioning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this