The Organizational Account of Function is an Etiological Account of Function

Marc Artiga, Manolo Martínez

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)


    © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. The debate on the notion of function has been historically dominated by dispositional and etiological accounts, but recently a third contender has gained prominence: the organizational account. This original theory of function is intended to offer an alternative account based on the notion of self-maintaining system. However, there is a set of cases where organizational accounts seem to generate counterintuitive results. These cases involve cross-generational traits, that is, traits that do not contribute in any relevant way to the self-maintenance of the organism carrying them, but instead have very important effects on organisms that belong to the next generation. We argue that any plausible solution to the problem of cross-generational traits shows that the organizational account just is a version of the etiological theory and, furthermore, that it does not provide any substantive advantage over standard etiological theories of function.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)105-117
    JournalActa Biotheoretica
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2016


    • Cross-generational trait
    • Epiphenomenalism
    • Etiological account
    • Function
    • Organizational account


    Dive into the research topics of 'The Organizational Account of Function is an Etiological Account of Function'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this