Abstract
This paper discusses how to approach the history of female possessions today. By analyzing some recent contributions applied to two well-known historical figures: Teresa de Ávila (1515–1582) and Jeanne des Anges (1602–1665), I will problematize some of the ongoing history of female possessions. I intend a reflection on two of the current conceptual frameworks that feature the way history explains the subjective experience of these premodern possessed individuals. I focus on two kinds of interpretation: one I call the ‘neurotic’ interpretation, and the other the ‘subversive’ interpretation. Both constructions underpin explanations of women’s divine and demonic possessions, involving historiographical gender prejudices and ahistorical assumptions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 125-141 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Women's History Review |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Jan 2020 |
Keywords
- Divine and demonic possession
- Jeanne des Anges
- Teresa de Ávila
- ahistoricism
- gender history
- historiography
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The historical understanding of female premodern possessions. Problematizing some gender assumptions in the historiography on Teresa de Ávila and Jeanne des Anges'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver