Abstract
This paper discusses how to approach the history of female possessions today. By analyzing some recent contributions applied to two well-known historical figures: Teresa de Ávila (1515–1582) and Jeanne des Anges (1602–1665), I will problematize some of the ongoing history of female possessions. I intend a reflection on two of the current conceptual frameworks that feature the way history explains the subjective experience of these premodern possessed individuals. I focus on two kinds of interpretation: one I call the ‘neurotic’ interpretation, and the other the ‘subversive’ interpretation. Both constructions underpin explanations of women’s divine and demonic possessions, involving historiographical gender prejudices and ahistorical assumptions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 125-141 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Women's History Review |
Volume | 29 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2 Jan 2020 |
Keywords
- Divine and demonic possession
- Jeanne des Anges
- Teresa de Ávila
- ahistoricism
- gender history
- historiography