Abstract
© 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This paper discusses how to approach the history of female possessions today. By analyzing some recent contributions applied to two well-known historical figures: Teresa de Ávila (1515–1582) and Jeanne des Anges (1602–1665), I will problematize some of the ongoing history of female possessions. I intend a reflection on two of the current conceptual frameworks that feature the way history explains the subjective experience of these premodern possessed individuals. I focus on two kinds of interpretation: one I call the ‘neurotic’ interpretation, and the other the ‘subversive’ interpretation. Both constructions underpin explanations of women’s divine and demonic possessions, involving historiographical gender prejudices and ahistorical assumptions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Women's History Review |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2019 |
Keywords
- ahistoricism
- Divine and demonic possession
- gender history
- historiography
- Jeanne des Anges
- Teresa de Ávila