The effects of surprise political events on quoted firms: The March 2004 election in Spain

Pau Castells, Francesc Trillas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the last days of the electoral campaign for the 2004 general election in Spain, on Thursday March 11th 2004, a series of simultaneous terror attacks caused the death of 191 persons in commuting trains in the capital Madrid. Four days later, the opposition party won the election, against all predictions that were made prior to the terror attacks. This change in expectations presents a unique opportunity to take advantage of event study techniques to test some politico-economic hypotheses. The quantitative exercise is carried out employing Seemingly Unrelated Regressions (SUR). Hypothesis testing is improved by means of bootstrapping techniques. Convergence theories prove quite resilient as, jointly, quoted firms were not significantly affected by the election outcome. The impact on politically connected companies and particular economic sectors, however, suggest that a combination of capture and agency problems may play a role in explaining the effects of the change in expectations. © 2011 The Author(s).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)83-112
JournalSERIEs
Volume4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2013

Keywords

  • Agency
  • Capture
  • Elections
  • Event study
  • Median voter
  • Political connections

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The effects of surprise political events on quoted firms: The March 2004 election in Spain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this