The copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire II (COPSOQ II) in Spain-A tool for psychosocial risk assessment at the workplace

Salvador Moncada, Mireia Utzet, Emilia Molinero, Clara Llorens, Neus Moreno, Ariadna Galtés, Albert Navarro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: To describe the second version of the Spanish Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire and to present evidence of its validity and reliability. Methods: The original Danish long COPSOQ II questionnaire was adapted to the labor market, cultural, and linguistic setting of Spain and included in the 2010 Spanish Psychosocial Risks Survey. Analysis involved the assessment of psychometric characteristics and associations among psychosocial scales and health scales. Medium and short versions were derived from the long one. Results: The long questionnaire was configured with 24 dimensions (92 items); medium-length questionnaire with 20 dimensions (69 items); and short questionnaire with 14 dimensions (28 items). All scales showed acceptable reliability and concordance between versions. Most associations among psychosocial scales and Mental Health, Stress, and Burnout scales were in the expected direction, except the scale of Influence, that showed some incongruent associations. Conclusion: Results support the validity and reliability of Spanish COPSOQ II questionnaires as tools for psychosocial risk assessment at the workplace, however, better scales should be developed specially for the dimension of Influence. Am. J. Ind. Med. 57:97-107, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-107
JournalAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine
Volume57
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014

Keywords

  • Psychosocial factors
  • Psychosocial work environment
  • Questionnaires
  • Spain
  • Stress
  • Surveys

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire II (COPSOQ II) in Spain-A tool for psychosocial risk assessment at the workplace'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this