The Comparative Historical Analysis of Public Management Policy Cycles in France, Italy, and Spain: Symposium Conclusion

Michael Barzelay, Raquel Gallego

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This concluding article in the symposium develops generalizing arguments about the politics of public management reform in France, Italy, and Spain, by drawing out implications of the case studies presented in the three preceding articles. Some of these implications hold that established research arguments about politics of public management reform in the same cultural and geographical area require considerable qualification and reexamination. Some other implications of these case studies take the form of generalizing arguments about the process dynamics of public management policymaking. More specifically, an existing body of generalizing arguments is assessed and modified in the light of the research arguments crafted through the three case studies' dialogues between conceptual approaches and historical evidence. Together, these two discussions offer a contribution to the political science research literature on the politics of public management reform. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)297-307
JournalGovernance
Volume23
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2010

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Comparative Historical Analysis of Public Management Policy Cycles in France, Italy, and Spain: Symposium Conclusion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this