The Brevity Law as a Scaling Law, and a Possible Origin of Zipf's Law for Word Frequencies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An important body of quantitative linguistics is constituted by a series of statistical laws about language usage. Despite the importance of these linguistic laws, some of them are poorly formulated, and, more importantly, there is no unified framework that encompasses all them. This paper presents a new perspective to establish a connection between different statistical linguistic laws. Characterizing each word type by two random variables-length (in number of characters) and absolute frequency-we show that the corresponding bivariate joint probability distribution shows a rich and precise phenomenology, with the type-length and the type-frequency distributions as its two marginals, and the conditional distribution of frequency at fixed length providing a clear formulation for the brevity-frequency phenomenon. The type-length distribution turns out to be well fitted by a gamma distribution (much better than with the previously proposed lognormal), and the conditional frequency distributions at fixed length display power-law-decay behavior with a fixed exponent and a characteristic-frequency crossover that scales as an inverse power of length, which implies the fulfillment of a scaling law analogous to those found in the thermodynamics of critical phenomena. As a by-product, we find a possible model-free explanation for the origin of Zipf's law, which should arise as a mixture of conditional frequency distributions governed by the crossover length-dependent frequency.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEntropy
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • Quantitative linguistics
  • Brevity law
  • Abbreviation law
  • Power laws
  • Scaling
  • Zipf's law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Brevity Law as a Scaling Law, and a Possible Origin of Zipf's Law for Word Frequencies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this