Testing the cognitive burden of two choice modeling valuation variants. The between and within sample approaches

Pierre Alexandre Mahieu, Pere Riera, Raul Brey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Scores are commonly used in environmental valuation exercises. The two main procedures when testing for score differences are the within sample and the between sample approaches. Their conclusions do not always coincide. With a case study involving scores on difficulty of responding to two choice modeling variants -contingent ranking and contingent grouping-, the paper shows the strength of the within sample approach when relying on the coherent arbitrariness principle. Results suggest that the grouping is significantly less difficult to complete than the ranking task. The validity of these results is enhanced by the fact that they are independent of the exercise order, which is tested by randomizing the sequence order in which respondents face the two methods.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1384-1391
JournalEconomics Bulletin
Volume30
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 18 Jun 2010

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Testing the cognitive burden of two choice modeling valuation variants. The between and within sample approaches'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this