Strong artificial selection in domestic mammals did not result in an increased recombination rate

Violeta Munoz-Fuentes, Marina Marcet-Ortega, Gorka Alkorta-Aranburu, Catharina Linde Forsberg, Jane M. Morrell, Esperanza Manzano-Piedras, Arne Soderberg, Katrin Daniel, Adrian Villalba, Attila Toth, Anna Di Rienzo, Ignasi Roig, Carles Vila

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. Recombination rates vary in intensity and location at the species, individual, sex and chromosome levels. Despite the fundamental biological importance of this process, the selective forces that operate to shape recombination rate and patterns are unclear. Domestication offers a unique opportunity to study the interplay between recombination and selection. In domesticates, intense selection for particular traits is imposed on small populations over many generations, resulting in organisms that differ, sometimes dramatically, in morphology and physiology from their wild ancestor. Although earlier studies suggested increased recombination rate in domesticates, a formal comparison of recombination rates between domestic mammals and their wild congeners was missing. In order to determine broad-scale recombination rate, we used immunolabeling detection of MLH1 foci as crossover markers in spermatocytes in three pairs of closely related wild and domestic species (dog and wolf, goat and ibex, and sheep and mouflon). In the three pairs, and contrary to previous suggestions, our data show that contemporary recombination rate is higher in the wild species. Subsequently, we inferred recombination breakpoints in sequence data for 16 genomic regions in dogs and wolves, each containing a locus associated with a dog phenotype potentially under selection during domestication. No difference in the number and distribution of recombination breakpoints was found between dogs and wolves. We conclude that our data indicate that strong directional selection did not result in changes in recombination in domestic mammals, and that both upper and lower bounds for crossover rates may be tightly regulated.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)510-523
JournalMolecular Biology and Evolution
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2015

Keywords

  • Canis
  • Capra
  • genomics
  • immunolocalization
  • MLH1
  • Ovis
  • spermatocytes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Strong artificial selection in domestic mammals did not result in an increased recombination rate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this