TY - JOUR
T1 - Storing and sharing: A review of indigenous and local knowledge conservation initiatives
AU - Benyei, Petra
AU - Arreola, Guadalupe
AU - Reyes-García, Victoria
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - © 2019, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. Despite its relative adaptive capacity and its many values, indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) is rapidly eroding. Over the past decades a myriad of efforts have emerged to prevent this erosion. In this work, we reviewed and systematically coded 138 ILK conservation initiatives published in academic papers in order to explore trends in participation, digitalization, timing, location, and approach of the initiatives. We also explored factors influencing initiative inclusiveness. Our findings reveal that ILK holders are generally absent from most phases of the studied initiatives, although IT-based and in situ initiatives (i.e., education and community based conservation) appear as the exceptions. We also found that ex situ initiatives (i.e., research/documentation and policy/legislation efforts) are predominant, despite the challenges they reportedly face. These findings call for re-formulating the ways in which ex situ ILK conservation is done and for supporting in situ and IT based initiatives, as they offer the potential to lead the participatory turn.
AB - © 2019, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. Despite its relative adaptive capacity and its many values, indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) is rapidly eroding. Over the past decades a myriad of efforts have emerged to prevent this erosion. In this work, we reviewed and systematically coded 138 ILK conservation initiatives published in academic papers in order to explore trends in participation, digitalization, timing, location, and approach of the initiatives. We also explored factors influencing initiative inclusiveness. Our findings reveal that ILK holders are generally absent from most phases of the studied initiatives, although IT-based and in situ initiatives (i.e., education and community based conservation) appear as the exceptions. We also found that ex situ initiatives (i.e., research/documentation and policy/legislation efforts) are predominant, despite the challenges they reportedly face. These findings call for re-formulating the ways in which ex situ ILK conservation is done and for supporting in situ and IT based initiatives, as they offer the potential to lead the participatory turn.
KW - Inclusiveness
KW - Indigenous and local knowledge
KW - Knowledge conservation
KW - Systematic review
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01153-6
DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01153-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 30859400
SN - 0044-7447
JO - Ambio
JF - Ambio
ER -