TY - JOUR
T1 - Smart, Commodified and Encoded
T2 - Blockchain Technology for Environmental Sustainability and Nature Conservation
AU - Stuit, Andrea
AU - Brockington, Dan
AU - Corbera, Esteve
N1 - Funding Information:
Copyright: © Stuit et al. 2022. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and distribution of the article, provided the original work is cited. Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow, Mumbai | Managed and supported by the Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Bangalore. For reprints contact: WKHLRPMedknow_reprints@wolterskluwer.com
Publisher Copyright:
© Connors and Rea. 2022.
PY - 2022/1/1
Y1 - 2022/1/1
N2 - We explore the implications of blockchain technology for conservation and environmental policy. Drawing on an analysis of 27 initiatives, we examine their goals, assumptions, visions and workings. We find that these initiatives do not yet form a coherent approach, there is too much variety in their environmental focus, and the role of blockchain technology in achieving their goals. However, they share a faith in environmental-commodity markets, a penchant for surveillance and upward accountability, and lack a critical analysis of the main causes of environmental problems. Blockchain initiatives are forming a growing community of praxis and deepen ongoing trends in neoliberal environmental governance, characterised by the increased commodification and global accounting, surveillance and marketisation of environmental goods, services and outcomes. We suggest these services and outcomes fail to challenge the actual root causes of environmental degradation. At the same time, they are not all necessarily flawed by these characteristics. They can render information held by communities financially valuable in ways those communities may find useful. Future research should focus on exploring whether blockchain initiatives may at least translate in concrete environmental outcomes and contribute to the well-being of natural resource managers.
AB - We explore the implications of blockchain technology for conservation and environmental policy. Drawing on an analysis of 27 initiatives, we examine their goals, assumptions, visions and workings. We find that these initiatives do not yet form a coherent approach, there is too much variety in their environmental focus, and the role of blockchain technology in achieving their goals. However, they share a faith in environmental-commodity markets, a penchant for surveillance and upward accountability, and lack a critical analysis of the main causes of environmental problems. Blockchain initiatives are forming a growing community of praxis and deepen ongoing trends in neoliberal environmental governance, characterised by the increased commodification and global accounting, surveillance and marketisation of environmental goods, services and outcomes. We suggest these services and outcomes fail to challenge the actual root causes of environmental degradation. At the same time, they are not all necessarily flawed by these characteristics. They can render information held by communities financially valuable in ways those communities may find useful. Future research should focus on exploring whether blockchain initiatives may at least translate in concrete environmental outcomes and contribute to the well-being of natural resource managers.
KW - blockchain technology
KW - commodification
KW - cypherpunk
KW - distributed ledger
KW - surveillance
KW - trustlessness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125183263&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4103/cs.cs_41_21
DO - 10.4103/cs.cs_41_21
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85125183263
SN - 0972-4923
VL - 20
SP - 12
EP - 23
JO - Conservation and Society
JF - Conservation and Society
IS - 1
ER -