TY - JOUR
T1 - Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for the treatment of ileocolonic Crohn’s disease
T2 - a propensity score–matched analysis
AU - Celentano, Valerio
AU - Pellino, Gianluca
AU - Rottoli, Matteo
AU - Colombo, Francesco
AU - Sampietro, Gianluca
AU - Spinelli, Antonino
AU - Selvaggi, Francesco
AU - Celentano, Valerio
AU - Poggioli, Gilberto
AU - Sica, Giuseppe
AU - Giglio, Mariano Cesare
AU - Campanelli, Michela
AU - Coco, Claudio
AU - Rizzo, Gianluca
AU - Sionne, Francesco
AU - Lamperti, Giulia
AU - Foschi, Diego
AU - Ficari, Ferdinando
AU - Vacca, Ludovica
AU - Cricchio, Marta
AU - Giudici, Francesco
AU - Selvaggi, Lucio
AU - Sciaudone, Guido
AU - Peltrini, Roberto
AU - Manfreda, Andrea
AU - Bucci, Luigi
AU - Galleano, Raffaele
AU - Ghazouani, Omar
AU - Zorcolo, Luigi
AU - Deidda, Simona
AU - Restivo, Angelo
AU - Braini, Andrea
AU - Di Candido, Francesca
AU - Sacchi, Matteo
AU - Carvello, Michele
AU - Martorana, Stefania
AU - Bordignon, Giovanni
AU - Angriman, Imerio
AU - Variola, Angela
AU - Di Ruscio, Mirko
AU - Barugola, Giuliano
AU - Geccherle, Andrea
AU - Tropeano, Francesca Paola
AU - Luglio, Gaetano
AU - Tanzanu, Marta
AU - Sasia, Diego
AU - Migliore, Marco
AU - Giuffrida, Maria Carmela
AU - Marrano, Enrico
AU - Moretto, Gianluigi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - Introduction: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) aims to minimize the surgical access trauma by reducing the number of abdominal incisions to a single site, potentially offering better cosmetic results and decreased postoperative pain. In this study, we compare the results of SILS ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease (CD) to conventional laparoscopy and open surgery using a propensity score–matched analysis in a retrospective national multicentre study. Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing elective SILS ileocaecal or redo ileocolic resection for primary and recurrent CD from 1 June 2018 to 31 May 2019 were included. Patients were matched 1:1:1 with laparoscopy and open surgery according to perianal disease, recurrent disease, penetrating phenotype of CD, history of previous abdominal surgery, preoperative medical treatment with steroids and anti-TNF. Postoperative morbidity within 30 days of surgery was the primary endpoint. Results: Fifty-eight patients were included in each group, for a total of 174 patients. The conversion rate for SILS and laparoscopy was 10.3% and 12%, respectively, with no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications (13.8% and 12%, p = 0.77), whilst open surgery demonstrated a worse morbidity profile, with a complication rate of 25.9% (p < 0.0001). Median length of hospital stay following SILS ileocolic resection was 5 days, significantly shorter compared to 7 days for laparoscopy and 9 for open surgery (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: SILS ileocolonic resection for CD demonstrated a comparable morbidity profile compared to laparoscopy in selected patients, with a reduced length of postoperative hospital stay.
AB - Introduction: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) aims to minimize the surgical access trauma by reducing the number of abdominal incisions to a single site, potentially offering better cosmetic results and decreased postoperative pain. In this study, we compare the results of SILS ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease (CD) to conventional laparoscopy and open surgery using a propensity score–matched analysis in a retrospective national multicentre study. Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing elective SILS ileocaecal or redo ileocolic resection for primary and recurrent CD from 1 June 2018 to 31 May 2019 were included. Patients were matched 1:1:1 with laparoscopy and open surgery according to perianal disease, recurrent disease, penetrating phenotype of CD, history of previous abdominal surgery, preoperative medical treatment with steroids and anti-TNF. Postoperative morbidity within 30 days of surgery was the primary endpoint. Results: Fifty-eight patients were included in each group, for a total of 174 patients. The conversion rate for SILS and laparoscopy was 10.3% and 12%, respectively, with no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications (13.8% and 12%, p = 0.77), whilst open surgery demonstrated a worse morbidity profile, with a complication rate of 25.9% (p < 0.0001). Median length of hospital stay following SILS ileocolic resection was 5 days, significantly shorter compared to 7 days for laparoscopy and 9 for open surgery (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: SILS ileocolonic resection for CD demonstrated a comparable morbidity profile compared to laparoscopy in selected patients, with a reduced length of postoperative hospital stay.
KW - Crohn’s disease
KW - Inflammatory Bowel Disease
KW - Single-incision laparoscopic surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099500676&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00384-020-03821-6
DO - 10.1007/s00384-020-03821-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 33355687
AN - SCOPUS:85099500676
VL - 36
SP - 605
EP - 608
IS - 3
ER -