TY - JOUR
T1 - Simplified syringe procedures for the estimation of functional residual capacity
AU - Mancebo, Jorge
AU - Benito, Salvador
AU - Calaf, Nuria
AU - Net, Alvar
PY - 1988/1/1
Y1 - 1988/1/1
N2 - We studied different gas dilution techniques in order to validate an easy method for the measurement of functional residual capacity (FRC) in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) undergoing mechanical ventilation (MV). FRC was measured in duplicate using four different techniques in 22 adult patients. The reference technique was the bag-in-a-box (BB) with helium (BB He) which was compared with a BB with nitrogen (BB NO, with helium syringe (He S), and with N2 syringe N2 S) techniques. The mean values of FRC (in BTPS units) obtained with the different techniques were 1,108 mL ± 398 mL (BB He), 1,061 mL ± 418 mL (BB N2, 1,170 mL ± 431 mL (He S), and 1,050 mL ± 429 mL N2 S), the differences not being statistically significant. The linear regression equations were BB N2 = -42 + 0.99 BB He, He S=54 +1.00 BB He, and N2S= -66 + 1.00 BB He. The mean difference between duplicate determinations ranged between -1.8 mL and 14 mL. The techniques studied are useful and practical bedside procedures for the estimation of FRC in ARF patients undergoing MV. © 1988.
AB - We studied different gas dilution techniques in order to validate an easy method for the measurement of functional residual capacity (FRC) in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) undergoing mechanical ventilation (MV). FRC was measured in duplicate using four different techniques in 22 adult patients. The reference technique was the bag-in-a-box (BB) with helium (BB He) which was compared with a BB with nitrogen (BB NO, with helium syringe (He S), and with N2 syringe N2 S) techniques. The mean values of FRC (in BTPS units) obtained with the different techniques were 1,108 mL ± 398 mL (BB He), 1,061 mL ± 418 mL (BB N2, 1,170 mL ± 431 mL (He S), and 1,050 mL ± 429 mL N2 S), the differences not being statistically significant. The linear regression equations were BB N2 = -42 + 0.99 BB He, He S=54 +1.00 BB He, and N2S= -66 + 1.00 BB He. The mean difference between duplicate determinations ranged between -1.8 mL and 14 mL. The techniques studied are useful and practical bedside procedures for the estimation of FRC in ARF patients undergoing MV. © 1988.
U2 - 10.1016/0883-9441(88)90089-5
DO - 10.1016/0883-9441(88)90089-5
M3 - Article
VL - 3
SP - 180
EP - 189
JO - Journal of Critical Care
JF - Journal of Critical Care
SN - 0883-9441
IS - 3
ER -