TY - JOUR
T1 - Significance of pelvic floor muscles in anal incontinence
AU - FernándezFraga, Xose
AU - Azpiroz, Fernando
AU - Malagelada, Juan R.
PY - 2002/11/1
Y1 - 2002/11/1
N2 - Background & Aims: The pathophysiology of anal incontinence may be elusive using current parameters. Our aim was to establish the role of the levator ani in anal continence. Methods: In 53 patients with anal incontinence, 30 with constipation as disease controls, and 15 healthy controls, we evaluated incontinence severity by a 0-12 scale, anorectal function by standard manometric tests, and levator ani contraction by a perineal dynamometer. Results: Patients with incontinence exhibited various physiologic abnormalities (3.2 ± 0.3 per patient), but multiple regression analysis showed that levator ani contraction was the independent variable with strongest relation to the severity of incontinence (R = -0.84; P < 0.0001), as well as a predictive factor of the response to treatment (R = 0.53; P < 0.01). Furthermore, in contrast to other physiologic parameters, clinical improvement in response to treatment (4.4 ± 0.5 score vs. 7.9 ± 0.5 score pre; P < 0.001) was associated with a marked and significant strengthening of levator ani contraction (448 ± 47 g vs. 351 ± 35 g pre; P < 0.05). Conclusions: We have shown the importance of levator ani failure in understanding the etiology of anal incontinence and in predicting response to treatment.
AB - Background & Aims: The pathophysiology of anal incontinence may be elusive using current parameters. Our aim was to establish the role of the levator ani in anal continence. Methods: In 53 patients with anal incontinence, 30 with constipation as disease controls, and 15 healthy controls, we evaluated incontinence severity by a 0-12 scale, anorectal function by standard manometric tests, and levator ani contraction by a perineal dynamometer. Results: Patients with incontinence exhibited various physiologic abnormalities (3.2 ± 0.3 per patient), but multiple regression analysis showed that levator ani contraction was the independent variable with strongest relation to the severity of incontinence (R = -0.84; P < 0.0001), as well as a predictive factor of the response to treatment (R = 0.53; P < 0.01). Furthermore, in contrast to other physiologic parameters, clinical improvement in response to treatment (4.4 ± 0.5 score vs. 7.9 ± 0.5 score pre; P < 0.001) was associated with a marked and significant strengthening of levator ani contraction (448 ± 47 g vs. 351 ± 35 g pre; P < 0.05). Conclusions: We have shown the importance of levator ani failure in understanding the etiology of anal incontinence and in predicting response to treatment.
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1053/gast.2002.36586
DO - https://doi.org/10.1053/gast.2002.36586
M3 - Article
SN - 0016-5085
VL - 123
SP - 1441
EP - 1450
JO - Gastroenterology
JF - Gastroenterology
ER -