TY - JOUR
T1 - Sampling Device-Dependence of Prokaryotic Community Structure on Marine Particles
T2 - Higher Diversity Recovered by in situ Pumps Than by Oceanographic Bottles
AU - Puigcorbé, Viena
AU - Ruiz-González, Clara
AU - Masqué, Pere
AU - Gasol, Josep M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright © 2020 Puigcorbé, Ruiz-González, Masqué and Gasol.
PY - 2020/7/15
Y1 - 2020/7/15
N2 - Microbes associated with sinking marine particles play key roles in carbon sequestration in the ocean. The sampling of particle-attached microorganisms is often done with sediment traps or by filtration of water collected with oceanographic bottles, both involving a certain time lapse between collection and processing of samples that may result in changes in particle-attached microbial communities. Conversely, in situ water filtration through submersible pumps allows a faster storage of sampled particles, but it has rarely been used to study the associated microbial communities and has never been compared to other particle-sampling methods in terms of the recovery of particle microbial diversity. Here we compared the prokaryotic communities attached to small (1–53 μm) and large (>53 μm) particles collected from the mesopelagic zone (100–300 m) of two Antarctic polynyas using in situ pumps (ISP) and oceanographic bottles (BTL). Each sampling method retrieved largely different particle-attached communities, suggesting that they capture different kinds of particles. These device-driven differences were greater for large particles than for small particles. Overall, the ISP recovered 1.5- to 3-fold more particle-attached bacterial taxa than the BTL, and different taxonomic groups were preferentially recovered by each method. In particular, typical particle-attached groups such as Planctomycetes and Deltaproteobacteria recovered with ISP were nearly absent from BTL samples. Our results suggest that the method used to sample marine particles has a strong influence in our view of their associated microbial communities.
AB - Microbes associated with sinking marine particles play key roles in carbon sequestration in the ocean. The sampling of particle-attached microorganisms is often done with sediment traps or by filtration of water collected with oceanographic bottles, both involving a certain time lapse between collection and processing of samples that may result in changes in particle-attached microbial communities. Conversely, in situ water filtration through submersible pumps allows a faster storage of sampled particles, but it has rarely been used to study the associated microbial communities and has never been compared to other particle-sampling methods in terms of the recovery of particle microbial diversity. Here we compared the prokaryotic communities attached to small (1–53 μm) and large (>53 μm) particles collected from the mesopelagic zone (100–300 m) of two Antarctic polynyas using in situ pumps (ISP) and oceanographic bottles (BTL). Each sampling method retrieved largely different particle-attached communities, suggesting that they capture different kinds of particles. These device-driven differences were greater for large particles than for small particles. Overall, the ISP recovered 1.5- to 3-fold more particle-attached bacterial taxa than the BTL, and different taxonomic groups were preferentially recovered by each method. In particular, typical particle-attached groups such as Planctomycetes and Deltaproteobacteria recovered with ISP were nearly absent from BTL samples. Our results suggest that the method used to sample marine particles has a strong influence in our view of their associated microbial communities.
KW - in situ pumps
KW - marine particles
KW - oceanographic bottles
KW - polynyas
KW - prokaryotic communities
KW - size-fractionation
KW - in situ pumps
KW - marine particles
KW - oceanographic bottles
KW - polynyas
KW - prokaryotic communities
KW - size-fractionation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088940394&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01645
DO - https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01645
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85088940394
SN - 1664-302X
VL - 11
JO - Frontiers in Microbiology
JF - Frontiers in Microbiology
M1 - 1645
ER -