Response Systems: The Syntax and Semantics of Fragment Answers and Response Particles

M.Teresa Espinal*, Susagna Tubau

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article critically reviews the main research issues raised in the study of response systems in natural languages by addressing the syntax and semantics of fragment answers and yes/no response particles. Fragment answers include replies that do not have a sentential form, whereas response particles consist solely of an affirmative or a negative adverb. While the main research question in the syntax of fragments and response particles has been whether these contain more syntactic structure than what is actually pronounced, the key issues in the study of their semantics are question–answer congruence, the anaphoric potential of response particles, and the meaning of fragments in relation to positive and negative questions. In connection to these issues, this review suggests some interesting avenues for further research: ( a) providing an analysis of particles other than yes/no, ( b) choosing between echoic versus nonechoic forms as answers to polar questions, and ( c) deciding whether some non-lexically-based or nonverbal responses are systematically used in combination with polar particles to express (dis)agreement.</jats:p>
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)261-287
Number of pages27
JournalAnnual Review of Linguistics
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Jan 2019

Keywords

  • DISCOURSE
  • POLAR QUESTIONS
  • PROSODY
  • answers
  • fragments
  • response particles
  • semantics
  • syntax

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Response Systems: The Syntax and Semantics of Fragment Answers and Response Particles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this