Questioning the Ecological Footprint

Alessandro Galli; Mario Giampietro; Steve Goldfinger; Elias Lazarus; David Lin; Andrea Saltelli; Mathis Wackernagel; Felix Müller

doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.04.014

Questioning the Ecological Footprint

Alessandro Galli, Mario Giampietro, Steve Goldfinger, Elias Lazarus, David Lin, Andrea Saltelli, Mathis Wackernagel, Felix Müller

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. In this perspective paper a critical discussion about the concept of the Ecological Footprint is documented based on 10 questions which are answered from critical and supporting points-of-view. These key questions are directed toward the underlying research objectives of the approach, a comparison with similar concepts, the quantification methodology and its accuracy, the characteristics of the observed flows, the role of scales and resolutions, the implementation of food security, the utility of the ecological footprint for society, the political relevance of the concept and the differences from other international indicator systems.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	224-232
Journal	Ecological Indicators
Volume	69
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.04.014
Publication status	Published - 1 Oct 2016

Keywords

Footprint applicability
Footprint critics
Footprint methodology
Footprint relevance
Footprint utility

Access to Document

10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.04.014

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Questioning the Ecological Footprint'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{a685626cf0524fe68f9a9ad1a8031082,

title = "Questioning the Ecological Footprint",

abstract = "{\textcopyright} 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. In this perspective paper a critical discussion about the concept of the Ecological Footprint is documented based on 10 questions which are answered from critical and supporting points-of-view. These key questions are directed toward the underlying research objectives of the approach, a comparison with similar concepts, the quantification methodology and its accuracy, the characteristics of the observed flows, the role of scales and resolutions, the implementation of food security, the utility of the ecological footprint for society, the political relevance of the concept and the differences from other international indicator systems.",

keywords = "Footprint applicability, Footprint critics, Footprint methodology, Footprint relevance, Footprint utility",

author = "Alessandro Galli and Mario Giampietro and Steve Goldfinger and Elias Lazarus and David Lin and Andrea Saltelli and Mathis Wackernagel and Felix M{\"u}ller",

year = "2016",

month = oct,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.04.014",

language = "English",

volume = "69",

pages = "224--232",

journal = "Ecological Indicators",

issn = "1470-160X",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Questioning the Ecological Footprint

AU - Galli, Alessandro

AU - Giampietro, Mario

AU - Goldfinger, Steve

AU - Lazarus, Elias

AU - Lin, David

AU - Saltelli, Andrea

AU - Wackernagel, Mathis

AU - Müller, Felix

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. In this perspective paper a critical discussion about the concept of the Ecological Footprint is documented based on 10 questions which are answered from critical and supporting points-of-view. These key questions are directed toward the underlying research objectives of the approach, a comparison with similar concepts, the quantification methodology and its accuracy, the characteristics of the observed flows, the role of scales and resolutions, the implementation of food security, the utility of the ecological footprint for society, the political relevance of the concept and the differences from other international indicator systems.

AB - © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. In this perspective paper a critical discussion about the concept of the Ecological Footprint is documented based on 10 questions which are answered from critical and supporting points-of-view. These key questions are directed toward the underlying research objectives of the approach, a comparison with similar concepts, the quantification methodology and its accuracy, the characteristics of the observed flows, the role of scales and resolutions, the implementation of food security, the utility of the ecological footprint for society, the political relevance of the concept and the differences from other international indicator systems.

KW - Footprint applicability

KW - Footprint critics

KW - Footprint methodology

KW - Footprint relevance

KW - Footprint utility

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.04.014

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.04.014

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 224

EP - 232

JO - Ecological Indicators

JF - Ecological Indicators

SN - 1470-160X

ER -