Prognostic factors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Comparison of CHAID decision trees technology and cox analysis

Francesc Xavier Avilés-Jurado, Xavier León

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The purpose of this study was to compare the risk factors obtained from a classical statistical method (Cox proportional hazards model) and the results obtained with classification trees (Chi-square Automatic Interaction Detection [CHAID] model) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Methods We conducted a retrospective study of 3373 patients with HNSCC and a follow-up longer than 2 years. Results The most decisive variable classified by CHAID was T category. N classification was an important prognostic factor in the Cox analysis, but this was not considered in CHAID except in T2 and supraglottic T3. CHAID also indicated that women with oral cavity T3/T4 to N0 tumors had poorer prognosis (28%) than men (58.5%; p value <.001). In oropharynx location, men had lower survival than women (41% vs 72%; p value <.001). Conclusions The main benefit of CHAID analysis is that it identifies a relatively small number of patients with a singular behavior, which is more discriminatory for an optimal diagnosis and treatment. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)877-883
JournalHead and Neck
Volume35
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2013

Keywords

  • CHAID
  • Cox's proportional hazard model
  • head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
  • prognostic factors
  • statistics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Prognostic factors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Comparison of CHAID decision trees technology and cox analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this