Private versus social incentives for pharmaceutical innovation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

© 2016 Elsevier B.V. We provide a theoretical framework to contribute to the current debate regarding the tendency of pharmaceutical companies to direct their R&D toward marketing products that are “follow-on” drugs of already existing drugs, rather than toward the development of breakthrough drugs. We construct a model with a population of patients who can be treated with drugs that are horizontally and vertically differentiated. In addition to a pioneering drug, a new drug can be marketed as the result of an innovative process. We analyze physician prescription choices and the optimal pricing decision of an innovative firm. We also characterize the incentives of the innovative firm to conduct R&D activities, disentangling the quest for breakthrough drugs from the firm effort to develop follow-on drugs. Our results offer theoretical support for the conventional wisdom that pharmaceutical firms devote too many resources to conducting R&D activities that lead to incremental innovations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)286-297
JournalJournal of Health Economics
Volume50
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2016

Keywords

  • Breakthrough drugs
  • Innovation
  • Me-too drugs
  • Pharmaceuticals
  • R&D activities

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Private versus social incentives for pharmaceutical innovation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this