Preoperative oral antibiotic prophylaxis reduces Pseudomonas aeruginosa surgical site infections after elective colorectal surgery: A multicenter prospective cohort study

A. Gomila*, J. Carratalà, J. M. Badia, D. Camprubí, M. Piriz, E. Shaw, V. Diaz-Brito, E. Espejo, C. Nicolás, M. Brugués, R. Perez, A. Lérida, A. Castro, S. Biondo, D. Fraccalvieri, E. Limón, F. Gudiol, M. Pujol, Xavier Serra-Aracil, Laura MoraAntoni Cruz, Encarna Moreno, Francesc Aguilar, Lurdes Pagespetit, Núria Freixas, Albert Navarro, Lydia Martin, Camilo Sanz, Jordi Cuquet, Rosa Vazquez, Nares Arroyo, Ana Felisa Lopez, Simona Iftimie, Josefina Obradors, Anna Marrón

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Healthcare-associated infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa are associated with poor outcomes. However, the role of P. aeruginosa in surgical site infections after colorectal surgery has not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to determine the predictive factors and outcomes of surgical site infections caused by P. aeruginosa after colorectal surgery, with special emphasis on the role of preoperative oral antibiotic prophylaxis. Methods: We conducted an observational, multicenter, prospective cohort study of all patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery at 10 Spanish hospitals (2011-2014). A logistic regression model was used to identify predictive factors for P. aeruginosa surgical site infections. Results: Out of 3701 patients, 669 (18.1%) developed surgical site infections, and 62 (9.3%) of these were due to P. aeruginosa. The following factors were found to differentiate between P. aeruginosa surgical site infections and those caused by other microorganisms: American Society of Anesthesiologists' score III-IV (67.7% vs 45.5%, p = 0.001, odds ratio (OR) 2.5, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.44-4.39), National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance risk index 1-2 (74.2% vs 44.2%, p < 0.001, OR 3.6, 95% CI 2.01-6.56), duration of surgery ≥75thpercentile (61.3% vs 41.4%, p = 0.003, OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.31-3.83) and oral antibiotic prophylaxis (17.7% vs 33.6%, p = 0.01, OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.21-0.83). Patients with P. aeruginosa surgical site infections were administered antibiotic treatment for a longer duration (median 17 days [interquartile range (IQR) 10-24] vs 13d [IQR 8-20], p = 0.015, OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.00-1.12), had a higher treatment failure rate (30.6% vs 20.8%, p = 0.07, OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.96-2.99), and longer hospitalization (median 22 days [IQR 15-42] vs 19d [IQR 12-28], p = 0.02, OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.00-1.17) than those with surgical site infections due to other microorganisms. Independent predictive factors associated with P. aeruginosa surgical site infections were the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance risk index 1-2 (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.03-5.40) and the use of oral antibiotic prophylaxis (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.23-0.90). Conclusions: We observed that surgical site infections due to P. aeruginosa are associated with a higher National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance risk index, poor outcomes, and lack of preoperative oral antibiotic prophylaxis. These findings can aid in establishing specific preventive measures and appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Article number507
Number of pages9
JournalBMC Infectious Diseases
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Oct 2018

Keywords

  • Colorectal cancer
  • Colorectal surgery
  • Healthcare-associated infection
  • Spain
  • Surgical site infection

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Preoperative oral antibiotic prophylaxis reduces Pseudomonas aeruginosa surgical site infections after elective colorectal surgery: A multicenter prospective cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this