Preliminary checklist for reporting observational studies in sports areas: Content validity

Salvador Chacón-Moscoso, Susana Sanduvete-Chaves, M. Teresa Anguera, José L. Losada, Mariona Portell, José A. Lozano-Lozano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

© 2018 Chacón-Moscoso, Sanduvete-Chaves, Anguera, Losada, Portell and Lozano-Lozano. Observational studies are based on systematic observation, understood as an organized recording and quantification of behavior in its natural context. Applied to the specific area of sports, observational studies present advantages when comparing studies based on other designs, such as the flexibility for adapting to different contexts and the possibility of using non-standardized instruments as well as a high degree of development in specific software and data analysis. Although the importance and usefulness of sports-related observational studies have been widely shown, there is no checklist to report these studies. Consequently, authors do not have a guide to follow in order to include all of the important elements in an observational study in sports areas, and reviewers do not have a reference tool for assessing this type of work. To resolve these issues, this article aims to develop a checklist to measure the quality of sports-related observational studies based on a content validity study. The participants were 22 judges with at least 3 years of experience in observational studies, sports areas, and methodology. They evaluated a list of 60 items systematically selected and classified into 12 dimensions. They were asked to score four aspects of each item on 5-point Likert scales to measure the following dimensions: representativeness, relevance, utility, and feasibility. The judges also had an open-format section for comments. The Osterlind index was calculated for each item and for each of the four aspects. Items were considered appropriate when obtaining a score of at least 0.5 in the four assessed aspects. After considering these inclusion criteria and all of the open-format comments, the resultant checklist consisted of 54 items grouped into the same initial 12 dimensions. Finally, we highlight the strengths of this work. We also present its main limitation: the need to apply the resultant checklist to obtain data and, thus, increase quality indicators of its psychometric properties. For this reason, as relevant actions for further development, we encourage expert readers to use it and provide feedback; we plan to apply it to different sport areas.
Original languageEnglish
Article number291
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume9
Issue numberMAR
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Mar 2018

Keywords

  • Checklist
  • Content validity
  • Experts
  • Observational studies
  • Osterlind index
  • Reporting
  • Sports area

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Preliminary checklist for reporting observational studies in sports areas: Content validity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this