Abstract
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Post-operative pulmonary complications (PPCs) can have severe consequences and their incidence is high. In recent years, PPCs have been the subject of numerous studies and articles, which have provided a great deal of information that is beneficial but that can cause confusion on a practical level. This review focusses on three main points: (1) the definitions of PPCs, which are heterogeneous and often vary from one report to another, despite emerging consensus; (2) the risk as reflected in the pool of PPC predictors, with each study identifying some but leaving us with a myriad of combinations; and (3) the many PPC prediction scores proposed, each with its strengths and limitations. We attempt to clarify the practical and research implications of the current situation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 315-330 |
Journal | Best Practice and Research: Clinical Anaesthesiology |
Volume | 29 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2015 |
Keywords
- cohort studies
- lung diseases
- post-operative complications
- predictive value of tests
- prospective studies
- quality control
- respiratory tract infections
- risk assessment
- risk factors