TY - JOUR
T1 - Post-classification change detection with data from different sensors: Some accuracy considerations
AU - Sauri Pujol, David
AU - Pons Fernandez, Xavier
AU - Serra, P.
PY - 2003/8/20
Y1 - 2003/8/20
N2 - Change detection from remote sensing data is often done by simple overlay of classified maps. However, such analyses can contain a significant proportion of boundary errors, especially when combining data from different sensors. This paper presents a protocol that allows reliable post-classification comparisons by taking into account classification accuracies, landscape fragmentation, planimetric accuracies, pixel sizes and grid origins. The proposed protocol has been applied, with little extra effort, in a fragmented agricultural Mediterranean zone using MSS (1970s) and TM (1990s) images. Applying the protocol, change detection had an accuracy of 85.1%, while for a direct overlay it was only 43.9% accurate. The drawback of this method is that it reduces the useful area of comparison. As the accuracy of individual classifications is critical, the paper also describes and tests a hybrid classifier that combines an unsupervised classification approach with training areas. This approach has proved more successful than maximum likelihood classifiers.
AB - Change detection from remote sensing data is often done by simple overlay of classified maps. However, such analyses can contain a significant proportion of boundary errors, especially when combining data from different sensors. This paper presents a protocol that allows reliable post-classification comparisons by taking into account classification accuracies, landscape fragmentation, planimetric accuracies, pixel sizes and grid origins. The proposed protocol has been applied, with little extra effort, in a fragmented agricultural Mediterranean zone using MSS (1970s) and TM (1990s) images. Applying the protocol, change detection had an accuracy of 85.1%, while for a direct overlay it was only 43.9% accurate. The drawback of this method is that it reduces the useful area of comparison. As the accuracy of individual classifications is critical, the paper also describes and tests a hybrid classifier that combines an unsupervised classification approach with training areas. This approach has proved more successful than maximum likelihood classifiers.
U2 - 10.1080/0143116021000021189
DO - 10.1080/0143116021000021189
M3 - Article
SN - 0143-1161
VL - 24
SP - 3311
EP - 3340
JO - International Journal of Remote Sensing
JF - International Journal of Remote Sensing
ER -